Originally posted by: Son of a N00b
cable would end up being faster...but i am warning you now your gonna get all these ppl that have dsl but r jeleous and say that dsl is faster becuase of latency...but thats BS ppl both a dsl and cable line are shared!
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why are you guys so dense? He OBVIOUSLY means 4mbps and 384kbps. Have you ever heard of 4megabyte/sec broadband?
4mbps is faster. There are 1024kbps in 1mbps. 4mbps is therefore 10.67x as fast as 384kbps.
Originally posted by: bleeb
Originally posted by: mercanucaribe
Why are you guys so dense? He OBVIOUSLY means 4mbps and 384kbps. Have you ever heard of 4megabyte/sec broadband?
4mbps is faster. There are 1024kbps in 1mbps. 4mbps is therefore 10.67x as fast as 384kbps.
Well the question now becomes, are the download differences noticable? The cost differences are about 10-15 dollars and I'm not sure if the extra cost would be worth it if there isn't much noticable difference in d/l and u/l between the two services.
Use: just plain internet. emails.
Originally posted by: Bootprint
If dropped in a vacuum, they would both hit the ground at the same time.