• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which is correct english?

Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
You didn't ask about the validity of the information, only which was correct english. That's why I hate this example.

How can english be correct if it says something wrong?
 
Originally posted by: athithi
You forgot the "I'm not dumb enough to fall for this lame poll" option 😛

Very true. I thought about putting a neither option, but decided it would be too obvious.
 
Both sentences have incorrect punctuation. They should end in periods, not question marks.

And, re: the 2nd sentence, the plural of "yolk" is "yolks."
 
Originally posted by: hjo3
Both sentences have incorrect punctuation. They should end in periods, not question marks.

And, re: the 2nd sentence, the plural of "yolk" is "yolks."

LOL.

I will change that.
 
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: CraigRT
Originally posted by: Jzero
Neither. The YOLK of an egg IS YELLOW

he's got a point 😀

put for pure english matter, first one... YOLK!

That was the point. Neither is correct. 🙂

well then why does it matter which english is correct?
the english is still correct in the first one.
 
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
You didn't ask about the validity of the information, only which was correct english. That's why I hate this example.

How can english be correct if it says something wrong?

Is it not possible to tell a lie, yet use correct english telling it?
 
Originally posted by: bunker
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
You didn't ask about the validity of the information, only which was correct english. That's why I hate this example.

How can english be correct if it says something wrong?

Is it not possible to tell a lie, yet use correct english telling it?

Is it not possible to tell a lie, yet use correct english while telling it?
 
Originally posted by: MogulMonster
Originally posted by: bunker
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
You didn't ask about the validity of the information, only which was correct english. That's why I hate this example.

How can english be correct if it says something wrong?

Is it not possible to tell a lie, yet use correct english telling it?

Is it not possible to tell a lie, yet use correct english while telling it?

Smartass 😛. And I'm pretty sure mine is still proper english.
 
Originally posted by: Garet Jax
Originally posted by: CubicZirconia
You didn't ask about the validity of the information, only which was correct english. That's why I hate this example.

How can english be correct if it says something wrong?

the grammar/spelling is right so the english is right. language != meaning. it's merely a medium for carrying information.
 
Garet Jax:
> How can english be correct if it says something wrong?

"In 1425, I singlehandedly built two of the Egyptian pyramids."

Proper English.
 
Originally posted by: hjo3
Garet Jax:
> How can english be correct if it says something wrong?

"In 1425, I singlehandedly built two of the Egyptian pyramids."

Proper English.

EXACTLY.

as i said in another thread, IF correct english required that ALL facts be accurate as well, NO works of fiction would be correct english.
rolleye.gif


 
You'r eonly fooling yourself with believing this is a good way to fool someone. Perhaps if you said, "Which is correct?" instead of "Which is correct english?" because adding the english part tells the reader we're thinking about grammar here, not context. So is "The yolk of an egg is white" correct english? Yes. Is it correct? No.
 
Back
Top