Originally posted by: Heisenberg
Lifetime imprisonment is actually cheaper.
Originally posted by: Spac3d
I don't see why we don't just go to the back of the courthouse and shoot them.
Originally posted by: Spoooon
Originally posted by: Spac3d
I don't see why we don't just go to the back of the courthouse and shoot them.
Well, one reason is the possibility that they might actually be innocent.![]()
Originally posted by: Dari
If the execution of a prisoner is more expensive than life imprisonment, then why don't we make it nominally more expensive. Just as we have a state medical program (Medicare and Medicaid), why can't we create a state (or federal) insurance program that can insure these executions. If there are any adverse incidents during execution, the state insurance pays. But if there isn't any, nobody loses. Has anyone ever thought about this?
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: Dari
If the execution of a prisoner is more expensive than life imprisonment, then why don't we make it nominally more expensive. Just as we have a state medical program (Medicare and Medicaid), why can't we create a state (or federal) insurance program that can insure these executions. If there are any adverse incidents during execution, the state insurance pays. But if there isn't any, nobody loses. Has anyone ever thought about this?
The cost is in the appeals, not the execution itself.
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: Dari
If the execution of a prisoner is more expensive than life imprisonment, then why don't we make it nominally more expensive. Just as we have a state medical program (Medicare and Medicaid), why can't we create a state (or federal) insurance program that can insure these executions. If there are any adverse incidents during execution, the state insurance pays. But if there isn't any, nobody loses. Has anyone ever thought about this?
The cost is in the appeals, not the execution itself.
But I've seen cats in prison that sue for everything. From the state denying their rights to practice satanism or whatever religion they created (such as one in which the worshippers must have sirloin steak for every meal) to the fact that the warden was mean to them. The fact is, these people have a lot of time on their hands and use the courts freequently. Unless I'm mistaken, aren't such frivolous as much a burden to the justice system as appeals from death row convicts?
Originally posted by: NeuroSynapsis
we should have it like china sometimes
1 bullet then bill the family
//
oops Imdmn04 got it first =(
