• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which is better 1 good card, or 2 weaker cards sli'd

Shotgun333

Junior Member


Say if cards were rank on a number system 1-10(10 being the best)

now would 2 ranked 5 cards sli'd be as good as a rank 10 card non sli'd.

I was wonder just in case rank 10 card was $200 But 2 ranked 5 cards were $100 total, then if it would be cheaper and better to go with 2 cards.

thanks for any info



Shotgun
 
SLI/Crossfire gains from 1 to 2 cards range from 0 to 100%.
In general, I'd say most games see about a 60-70% improvement when going from 1 to 2 cards.

so ... two cards that are fives would add up to 8 or 9.

Of course it totally depends on the games you want to play and what resolution you want to play them on.

Read some reviews and draw your conclusions from them.
 
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
2 slower cards are never better than 1 faster. even if the SLI is a bit faster it has too many headaches to deal with.

--are you speaking from personal experience?
😕

my 'headaches' do not stem from a cheap mult-GPU solution

CrossFire is an excellent alternative to a single faster card, imo.
-iit *all* depends on price [for me]
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
2 slower cards are never better than 1 faster. even if the SLI is a bit faster it has too many headaches to deal with.

--are you speaking from personal experience?
😕

my 'headaches' do not stem from a cheap mult-GPU solution

CrossFire is an excellent alternative to a single faster card, imo.
-iit *all* depends on price [for me]

Didnt you already have your 2900xt and then add another card later? Are you saying that at the time you would rather have had 2 2600's than your one 2900?


I figure it is better right now to get 1 good card than 2 medium card. I say get the $200 card now and pick up another in 6 months when they are ~$100
 
It all depends on how much the budget is. In some cases 2 cards would be better than one but when you are talking about 2 cheap cards you may be better with spending that money on one much better card.
 
Originally posted by: waffleironhead
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: tanishalfelven
2 slower cards are never better than 1 faster. even if the SLI is a bit faster it has too many headaches to deal with.

--are you speaking from personal experience?
😕

my 'headaches' do not stem from a cheap mult-GPU solution

CrossFire is an excellent alternative to a single faster card, imo.
-iit *all* depends on price [for me]

Didnt you already have your 2900xt and then add another card later? Are you saying that at the time you would rather have had 2 2600's than your one 2900?


I figure it is better right now to get 1 good card than 2 medium card. I say get the $200 card now and pick up another in 6 months when they are ~$100

that IS what i did 😛

i got AMD's top card back in May and then *added* a [o/c'd] 2900Pro three weeks ago.

my whole *point* is that it depends on variables of Price/performance
-you example does not give very good performance

 
Back
Top