Which is better? 1 Ghz Tbird: 11*100 or 10*110>

[Weyland]

I did it. I don't know how, though. When I unlocked my 1 Ghz Tbird, I could have it 11*100 and it would okay, but I couldn't bump the FSB up a notch without problems. Now, I am at stock + 110 FSB. So, in your opinion, which would be better?

11*100
OR
10*110

Thanks!

 

[Triggerhappy007]

10X110 is much faster even though it's the same MHz.

 

[twong82]

10x110

 

[pbox]

Since you got MSI K7T Pro2-A I would say 8*133 (1066) would outperform both of those, and your PCI and AGP bus will not be out of specs. That is a great source for instabilities. You could also try 8.5*133 (1133) if you prefer (slight overclock, should be no sweat).

Peter

 

[esung]

10x110 will have better performance, since everything is OCed 10%.. but of course it might introduce instability. at 11x100 only your CPU is OCed. everything stays the same.

 

[Fingers]

pbox,

That board will not support 133 mhz FSB, on those you are lucky to hit 110.

 

[Diesel21]

If you are not craving for FPS in quake3 or cracking RC5 then you wont notice the difference, hell you would'nt notice the difference going from 1 ghz -> 2 ghz

Frank

 

[Weyland]

Thanks for the responses! I tried 111 FSB, and I could get into Windows, but I couldn't play Unreal Tournament for long.

 

[ddiccico]

<< Since you got MSI K7T Pro2-A I would say 8*133 >>

you're probably thinking of the turbo. that has the 133 FSB.

 

[DarkMajiq]

Weyland: 10x110 will be faster, because everything in your board is running faster due to the increased FSB.

pbox: The MSI K7T Pro2A isn't a KT133A board. That's the K7T Turbo. There is no way the Pro2A will do 133MHz FSB, the highest anyone's been able to get a KT133 stable is about 119-120MHz, and that's extremely rare, most barely do 110.