I'm buying my new rig soon and I need your opinions regarding processors. I'm getting a GF 6800GT (probably Leadtek), 1 GB of PC3500 Kingston HyperX memory and... yea, that's my question
I'm currently considering 3 CPUs:
- Athlon 64 3000+ ($ 223 in my country);
- Athlon 64 3400+ ($ 431);
- Athlon 64 3500+ ($ 496).
Why A64 3000+? Good price... Besides, I've recently read an article on HardOCP where they overclocked it from 2 GHz to 2.45 GHz, yielding very significant performance improvements.
Why am I hesitating? Performance IS quite a bit lower than in the case of 3400+ and 3500+. Plus, it's socket 754.
Why A64 3400+? Price is now reasonable (by European standards) and it seems to be quite a bit faster than 3000+.
Why am I hesitating? Price difference between 3400+ and 3500+ is relatively small (well, around 65 bucks), and it's socket 754.
Why A64 3500+? Good performance, plus it's socket 939, and not really way more expensive than 3400+.
Why am I hesitating? Performance is not THAT stellar in comparison to 3400+ due to smaller cache (in fact, 3500+ even loses in some benchmarks, or is barely faster) = price premium not really justifiable; socket 939's upgradeability might be an illusion. My next major upgrade will come in ca. 2 years and by then, I think I'm going to need a different mobo anyway, with DDR2/PCI-E and maybe also BTX + other, new standards. Isn't s939's "future proof" label exaggerated and misleading for people like me?
Tell me what you think and which one you'd get
- Athlon 64 3000+ ($ 223 in my country);
- Athlon 64 3400+ ($ 431);
- Athlon 64 3500+ ($ 496).
Why A64 3000+? Good price... Besides, I've recently read an article on HardOCP where they overclocked it from 2 GHz to 2.45 GHz, yielding very significant performance improvements.
Why am I hesitating? Performance IS quite a bit lower than in the case of 3400+ and 3500+. Plus, it's socket 754.
Why A64 3400+? Price is now reasonable (by European standards) and it seems to be quite a bit faster than 3000+.
Why am I hesitating? Price difference between 3400+ and 3500+ is relatively small (well, around 65 bucks), and it's socket 754.
Why A64 3500+? Good performance, plus it's socket 939, and not really way more expensive than 3400+.
Why am I hesitating? Performance is not THAT stellar in comparison to 3400+ due to smaller cache (in fact, 3500+ even loses in some benchmarks, or is barely faster) = price premium not really justifiable; socket 939's upgradeability might be an illusion. My next major upgrade will come in ca. 2 years and by then, I think I'm going to need a different mobo anyway, with DDR2/PCI-E and maybe also BTX + other, new standards. Isn't s939's "future proof" label exaggerated and misleading for people like me?
Tell me what you think and which one you'd get