• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which AMD Mobo? Here is your answer!!

DerwenArtos12

Diamond Member
Every one is asking what motherboard to buy, so i am posting this topic and on other. This one is all about AMD. Here is what toms hardware has to say:

Here it is!

So you can stop asking now, ok.
 
umm, why the hell am i supposed to respect the opinion of that crackpot? i would rather get my computer tips from anand, thank you. i took that german nut off my bookmarks quite a while ago. thanks for reminding me why: both of those boards suck ass.
 
Originally posted by: yodayoda
umm, why the hell am i supposed to respect the opinion of that crackpot? i would rather get my computer tips from anand, thank you. i took that german nut off my bookmarks quite a while ago. thanks for reminding me why: both of those boards suck ass.

wow well fvck you too! for your information neigther of those boards suck acording to anand's team. and that german nut is quoted by anad's team on here quite often so watch who YOU are calling nuts
 
Quit whining about Tom's. We know they suck, just leave them to fester and go under. Better yet quit mentioning them so people continually go there to see why they suck, it just gives them more hits and more ad revenue.
 
So Patrick Schmid settled it once and for all? Thank Gott. Well, the English translation isn't gibberish at least.

"It is very difficult to distinguish any interesting or relevant differences in terms of performance; in this case the differences are too small and insignificant. "

But:
"All in all, the LANParty NFII Ultra makes such a good impression that, along with the Gigabyte GA-7NNXP, it takes victory in the test."

I don't know about you, but if the differences are "insignficant", I can get by without a "good impression."


Good thing you provided the link. Tom's needs more hits. Maybe you can stop by Tom's and link to some of Evan's and Wesley's excellent reviews.

 
I recall reading some good articles comparing video cards, printers and some individual reviews I thought were good.

Some I thought were worthless - but that can be said of any site.

Several years ago Tom said some things critical of Nvidia, which was regarded as blasphemy by Nvidia fans. Since then it's been 'open season' on him.

Now he's a 'crackpot' and a 'German nut'.

Get over it.
 
they didn't even do an overclocking ability test????

so great the dfi and whatever is the best at stock ... woop dee doo... how many people run their processors at stock???

EXACTLY

their article is bunk... and some of the features listed for the abit nf7-s is incorrect... vcore up to 1.85???? umm... last time i checked it went above 2.0+ vcore....

anyway... i don't trust tom's.... and now i see why....
 
Which AMD Mobo? Here is your answer!!
Well, I guess I'll join the "trash parade". Anyone that would take advice about and decide upon his/her MB, from one single source,(let alone Tom's), deserves what they get. And that won't be much.
 
Originally posted by: dunkster
ISeveral years ago Tom said some things critical of Nvidia, which was regarded as blasphemy by Nvidia fans. Since then it's been 'open season' on him.

Maybe that's part of it, if some people got their toes stepped on. I didn't know he trashed NVidia, though. But it was while promoting Nvidia to the hilt that Tom's rose to the top. Nvidia partisans were thrilled at that time. At that time 3Dfx was on the top, but soon on the way to bankruptcy. although that had nothing to do with Tom. If his site reversed itself, it's that kind of freakiness that make people think Tom is a nut.


>Now he's a 'crackpot' and a 'German nut'.

>Get over it

Does Tom himself comment on anything any more? The last time he condescended to editorialize that I remember, he said nothing about computers at all, but trashed his former guru, who taught Tom everything he knew, and actually wrote all of Tom's good technical pieces, which Tom spiced up in his own inimitable manner. Tom said he "despised" the guy. That was after the guru, in some kind of act of contrition, decided to reveal some of Tom's private wierdness in an editorial on his own site which was folding. It is stuff like that which makes Tom seem like a crackpot. With Tom's editorial was a picture with Tom in a "born again Christian" pose, a crucifix around his neck. Do "born again Christians" despise their former friends?

Well, that's Tom, and so what. His site does have some good major survey reviews. When you check the details of the parts you know first hand, and see they are wrong, you wonder how these articles are done.

 
Uh, Tom's Hardware sucks... Look at the million man lan. They where such dicks, sueing someone because they talked trash about you over the internet? Even if it is true? Thats a new level of lameness along with their "Radeon 9700 Pretender to the Throne"
 
Back
Top