Which A64 is the OC king?

Staz

Senior member
Jan 27, 2000
447
0
0
I know, this has probably been hashed out a zillion times, but my lazy arse doesn't want to go search a million posts, so I am asking it again.

I have a XP-M 2500+ overclocked to 2400MHz, but I want more speed, but don't have a ton of money to spend. Thus I want to get one of the lower priced A64 chips and overclock it. Before I do that, I need to know which one is known for it's overclocking potentional. Also, I am leading towards the 939-pin A64's so I can later upgrade and I want dual channel memory.
 

mwmorph

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2004
8,877
1
81
3000+ for value
3200+ for the 10x multiplier
much easier oon a good mb to hit 2.7 on a 3200+ than a 3000+
 

SunSamurai

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2005
3,914
0
0
a million posts? there are no less than 3 active threads talking about this right now.
 

Jaimie

Member
Nov 12, 2004
61
0
0
Originally posted by: Staz
Are A64's clocked locked?

Only the multipliers. HTT (equvilent of FSB) is unlocked, however, so you can overclock all you want.
 

ts3433

Platinum Member
Jun 29, 2004
2,731
0
0
Originally posted by: Staz
Are A64's clocked locked?

Full-on clock-locking would be prohibitively expensive to implement, from what I've heard, so I wouldn't plan on seeing it in chips anytime soon. Multipliers are locked upwards of stock, though, on all but the FX chips.

The Winchester 3000+ and 3200+ are the best values on the market right now. They'll overclock well even on the stock cooler and often stock voltage.
 

Staz

Senior member
Jan 27, 2000
447
0
0
So if the Winchester's run on the 200 FSB, the only way to OC them is to bump your FSB, meaning you would need to overclock the rest of your system also? I am sure most motherboards have an AGP lock, but not all memory overclocks that easilly. Is this what everone who overclocks is doing, just bumping their FSB?

And please explain what HTT is in more detail.
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: Staz
So if the Winchester's run on the 200 FSB, the only way to OC them is to bump your FSB, meaning you would need to overclock the rest of your system also? I am sure most motherboards have an AGP lock, but not all memory overclocks that easilly. Is this what everone who overclocks is doing, just bumping their FSB?

And please explain what HTT is in more detail.
HTT (HyperTransport Tunnel) is the "FSB." Athlon 64s don't really have a true FSB because of the on-die memory controller. The CPU speed is calculated from the HTT speed times the CPU multiplier. You can just raise the HTT speed like the FSB on older systems but when you hit a wall you can either lower the HTT multiplier or use a memory divider and keep on going. I got my 3000+ up to 2.5GHz (315HTTx8) on an Epox 9NDA3+. Also, I should mention that the lower multipliers ARE available on Athlon 64s but not higher ones.
 

Staz

Senior member
Jan 27, 2000
447
0
0
Originally posted by: MDE
Originally posted by: Staz
So if the Winchester's run on the 200 FSB, the only way to OC them is to bump your FSB, meaning you would need to overclock the rest of your system also? I am sure most motherboards have an AGP lock, but not all memory overclocks that easilly. Is this what everone who overclocks is doing, just bumping their FSB?

And please explain what HTT is in more detail.
HTT (HyperTransport Tunnel) is the "FSB." Athlon 64s don't really have a true FSB because of the on-die memory controller. The CPU speed is calculated from the HTT speed times the CPU multiplier. You can just raise the HTT speed like the FSB on older systems but when you hit a wall you can either lower the HTT multiplier or use a memory divider and keep on going. I got my 3000+ up to 2.5GHz (315HTTx8) on an Epox 9NDA3+. Also, I should mention that the lower multipliers ARE available on Athlon 64s but not higher ones.

If I understand this correctly, I could lock the rest of my system, meaning memory, AGP, and PCI bus speeds, and just raise the HTT, which would only effect my CPU? Or does raising the HTT effect other systems as well?
 

Shimmishim

Elite Member
Feb 19, 2001
7,504
0
76
you should read the overclocking guide (sticky in this forum) .... it'll answer a lot of your questions
 

Staz

Senior member
Jan 27, 2000
447
0
0
Originally posted by: Shimmishim
you should read the overclocking guide (sticky in this forum) .... it'll answer a lot of your questions

I do know how to overclock as my XP-M 2500+ is currently running at 2400MHz(12x200) at 1.6v. However, what I don't know is the difference between the FSB and HTT and if adjusting the HTT has the same effect as adjusting the FSB.
 

KoolDrew

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
10,226
7
81
If you are looking for something cheap to OC the 3200+ is great. I would choose it over the 3000+ just for the 10x multiplier.
 

Staz

Senior member
Jan 27, 2000
447
0
0
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
If you are looking for something cheap to OC the 3200+ is great. I would choose it over the 3000+ just for the 10x multiplier.

Looks like the 3200+ is a good $40-$50 more than the 3000+. Is it worth the extra money for the 10x multi?
 

imported_Bleh

Senior member
Sep 30, 2004
433
0
0
If you want to oc more easy then yes the extra $50 for the 3200+ is worth it. 260 mhz fsb needed to hit 2600mhz as opposed to approx 289 fsb for the 3000+ the only mobo that can achieve this high fsb time after time is the MSI K8N. All other Nforce 3 boards can easily get up to 260 mhz.
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: Bleh
If you want to oc more easy then yes the extra $50 for the 3200+ is worth it. 260 mhz fsb needed to hit 2600mhz as opposed to approx 289 fsb for the 3000+ the only mobo that can achieve this high fsb time after time is the MSI K8N. All other Nforce 3 boards can easily get up to 260 mhz.
The Epox boards seem to be hitting very high HTT speeds as well. Mine is at 315 and Nick1985 has his at 300.