• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which 9800Pro is better?

Cherub

Senior member
I have two cards, and will keep one for myself, but I'm not sure which is better:

425 core / 369 (738 DDR) mem
407 core / 385 (770 DDR) mem

Both seem to have the same or very similar AGP bus tolerances. Both are stock now, and the "winner" will get ramsinks and watercooling for the GPU.
 
I think I should have asked my question with a little more detail. I have two identical "Made by ATI" cards. The difference is that one has a more overclockable core while the other has more overclockable memory. The question is really which is more important, memory or core speed.

I plan a core and memory voltmod, the core will be watercooled, and the memory will get heat sinks, so there should be more room to exploit either way. I just need to make a decision on which card to keep based on these preliminary stock overclocks.
 
They are both good. Run 3dmark 2003 on both of them and keep whichever one gets a higher score. Then you have bragging rights for a better 3dmark score.
 
Originally posted by: Cherub
if both have 2.8ns samsung, get the first
Why?

Straight from Anand

The difference between the next generation of games and what we've seen in the past is that the performance of one game is much less indicative of the performance of the rest of the market; as you'll see, we're no longer memory bandwidth bound - now we're going to finally start dealing with games whose pixel shader programs and how they are handled by the execution units of the GPU will determine performance.

Can be read here
 
Back
Top