I picked up an MSI GeForce FX 5900 XT from ZipZoomFly for $195 shipped. While not the top performing card, it is one of the quietest at about 28 dB @ 12 inches. Considering the Ultra version runs $350, this might be the FX version of the "Ti4200." I think pannam1's prices are all for the XT/SE versions.
I got the 5900XT to replace my Ti4600 for fear of not having a back-up card. Other posters are correct in saying that the "normal" 5900s are being replaced by the 5900 XT/SE models. The flavors are now 5950 Ultra, 5900 Ultra, 5900 XT/SE. CPU & Memory clocks ( & speed ) are the only differences.
The MSI comes with 128 MB of Samsung 2.8 ns memory. There is not much room for overclocking there. The 3D CPU clock is set at 400 MHz. The memory clock is set at 700 MHz. The 2D clock is set at 300 MHz.
***** I did have some problems with getting the card to seat properly in my AGP 8x slot. I guess it depends on the mobo & case ( my slot retaining screw was a little off ).
The card is the retail version that comes with games - Elder Scrolls 3 : Morrowwind, Ghost Recon, Duke Nukem : Manhattan Project. Also comes with WinDVD creator plus and a driver disc with other goodies on it. The MSI driver version uses the nVidia 53.03 version. It comes with several cables - the VIVO cable, DVI to VGA dongle, and necessary video cables.
The first thing I did was run benchmarks using 3DMark2001SE build 330 and 3DMark2003 build 340.
My system:
Pentium 4 3.2 GHz w/ 800 MHz FSB & 512K L2
512 MB DDR400 CL2 ( Kingston HyperX 3200 )
Asus P4C800 Deluxe mobo
Windows ( Windoze , Winders, Windudz ) XP w/ SP1
DirectX 9.0b
nVidia driver v44.03 ( Ti4600 ) & v53.03 ( 5900 XT )
How the Ti4600 scored: ( Note : The v44.03 drivers worked best on this card - the 5x.xx drivers resulted in a ~8% preformance reduction )
3DMark 2001 SE b330 = 15261 ( standard settings for free version )
3DMark 2003 b340 = 1774 ( standard settings for free version - cannot be altered )
How the FX 5900 XT scored: ( I have not tried the 52.16 drivers. These are rumored to be faster than the 53.03 )
3DMark 2001 SE b330 = 16427 ( standard settings for free version )
3DMark 2003 b340 = 5639 ( standard settings for free version - cannot be altered )
Not much gain was seen in Mark 2001 SE since this is meant for DirectX 8.x. The real gain is in DirectX 9.x and 3DMark 2003.
I did a quick compare of similar CPU speeds vs. different GPUs and found that this GPU in my system is not far behind OCed 5900 Ultras. Some of those
ultras scored 5500 to 6000.
Consider the MSI 5900 XT if a quiet solution is needed.