Originally posted by: Bateluer
I THINK the 9000 Pro, but both are fairly weak. An 8500 LE and a 9100 would be better, methinks.
Yup hes right, since ATI removed thier compairison chart of the 8500 cards and I was curious to see if the 9000 cards were faster or not, I went a did a little research to find out the 9000 cards are MUCH MUCH slower than the 8500s. Why exactally are you getting such a weak card? Both are fairly weak, even a Radeon 9500Pro would beat these easily and with a soft mod you can get it to 9700PRo speeds...
To answer you question, I think you should go with the 9200 because otherwise they are in a dead heat with performance except that the 9000PRo has lower amount of memory. This is a very helpful tool:
http://apps.ati.com/ATIcompare/
Check both cards and do a compare, difference with the 9000PRo is 100MHZ faster core clock but that shouldn't make much of a difference. I bet you could Overclock that card to 500MHZ easily and then with out a doubt it would be a better card.
Remember you said in the long run, 128MB video would equate to longer life right off the bat I mean look at farcry, doom III and HL2. All these new games REQUIRE 64MB of video memory, why not get a card thats ahead of the game already!?