• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Which 1GHz is faster, Underclocked Athlon XP or Tbird?

dullard

Elite Member
Suppose I had a 1GHz T-bird (266 MHz fsb).
Suppose I had a 1GHz T-bird (200 MHz fsb).
Suppose I had an Athlon XP underclocked to 1GHz (with only the CPU speed changed, no other component changed).

Everything else is the same (as best it can be).

Which do you think is faster?
 
Thanks for your votes. It is what I expected for a result.

I asked this since I was in a debate about AMD's PR ratings. As we know, they are based on Tbird speeds. There are two reasonable possibilities when using that base:
A) PR rating = 1.5 * XPspeed - 500 (A linear formula)
B) PR rating = .148 * XPspeed^1.282 (A power formula)

Check of those rating formulas:
XP speed / Actual PR rating / PR rating (A) / PR rating(B)
1333       / 1500+             / 1500+          / 1501+
1400       / 1600+             / 1600+          / 1598+
1466       / 1700+             / 1700+          / 1696+
1533       / 1800+             / 1800+          / 1795+
1600       / 1900+             / 1900+          / 1896+
1666       / 2000+             / 2000+          / 1998+
1733       / 2100+             / 2100+          / 2101+

Obviously if you round the formula (B), then you have the same numbers within this range. However with extrapolations, things get completely different.

If you extrapolate backwards to 1 GHz formula (A) says that a 1GHz XP is the same exact speed as a 1 GHz Tbird. Obviously most people disagree with this (The XP has some architectural improvements over the Tbird). So I argue that formula (A) is wrong. Formula (B) predicts a PR rating of 1038+ for an underclocked 1 GHz Athlon XP - slightly faster than the Tbird. So I argue that formula (B) is better.

Extrapolating forward is the interesting part though. At higher speeds formula (B) gives a much higher PR rating for the same Athlon XP chip. Basically formula (B) will overexaggerate the performance.

Your thoughts? (Please keep it focused to the PR rating based on Tbird - no off topics)
 
Back
Top