- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
I was just thinking about where would Intel be at today, if not for the competition from AMD?
My first computer was an Intel Pentium mmx 233. And that chip was the top of the Intel line for like a year and a half.
If it weren't for the K6-2's Intel would have maybe even bumped the 233 to 266 and kept it at the top for another 6 months.
And without the Athlon, well, the p2-3 line would STILL be around today, I believe.
Since it is hard to actually determine what type of cpu and its speed Intel would be selling today without AMD (for instance without AMD we would never had seen the dead end "netburst') I am shooting for a year.
Without AMD as competition since 1998 I say Intel would be a full 3 years behind where they are now. We would be where we were in 2004. There would be no home user dual cores and we would only now be getting above 1.5 ghz.
My first computer was an Intel Pentium mmx 233. And that chip was the top of the Intel line for like a year and a half.
If it weren't for the K6-2's Intel would have maybe even bumped the 233 to 266 and kept it at the top for another 6 months.
And without the Athlon, well, the p2-3 line would STILL be around today, I believe.
Since it is hard to actually determine what type of cpu and its speed Intel would be selling today without AMD (for instance without AMD we would never had seen the dead end "netburst') I am shooting for a year.
Without AMD as competition since 1998 I say Intel would be a full 3 years behind where they are now. We would be where we were in 2004. There would be no home user dual cores and we would only now be getting above 1.5 ghz.