Where is intels 10GHz CPU they promised that would appear in 2011?

[HFS+]

http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/i...2011-20000726/

Intel are liars =(

 

[disappoint]

4ghz X 6 cores = 24 (effective) Ghz

maybe they can coin a new term eGhz (I hope not)


or for something more mainstream:
3 Ghz X 4 cores = 12 equivalent Ghz

 

[Ben90]

k.

 

[Nemesis 1]

http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/i...2011-20000726/

Intel are liars =(

LOL . P4 was scraped. If we sharnk a p4 down to 32nm it likely would hit 10ghz . but a SB @ 5ghz would wipe the floor with it . Intel didn't lie they spoke to soon(Larrabbee) . The P4 was a dead end . Good that intel seen this thanks to AMD waking them . Intel has become a lean mean fighting machine.

 

[RavenSEAL]

Example:
AMD X6 1090T @ 4GHZ (6 Cores)
6 (Cores) x 4.0Ghz = 24Ghz

It's basic math/logic.

EDIT: FYI, GHz is not all that matters. Ask AMD...

 

[dajeepster]

Intel has become a lean mean fighting machine.

which rapes my bank account everytime they release a new chip.. -_-

 

[RavenSEAL]

which rapes my bank account everytime they release a new chip.. -_-

And cheats during press conferences! :awe:

 

[Nemesis 1]

And cheats during press conferences! :awe:

If thats the as bad as intel cheats . I can live with it. I watched the video . I really don't see were the crime is Eden didn't even come close to pretending he was playing the game. Not in the video I watched. Anyone who thought that was a live demo has to be slow minded. Anand got to see the real demo . Which frankly surprised me . As intel is sitting on the IB IGP performance numbers . Just keep talking up the holy trinity and you will be deceived just like you were with BD. Intel has everthing well inhand.

 

[grkM3]

Id like to see a 22nm original p4 with tri gate.i think they could hit 10ghz on a single core staying under 140 watts.

Back then mhz sold systems and now its about efficiency per clock

 

[Nemesis 1]

And cheats during press conferences! :awe:

You should read closer AT article on AMDs lightning bolt . There is enough there to show deceptive practice after the real facts come out .

 

[bunnyfubbles]

since when did prediction = promise?

that being said, the higher efficiency IPC multicore/thread CPUs we have now would smoke the 10GHz CPUs we otherwise would have had

 

[RavenSEAL]

You should read closer AT article on AMDs lightning bolt . There is enough there to show deceptive practice after the real facts come out .

What does this have anything to do with AMD

 

[Puppies04]

And cheats during press conferences!

If AMD didn't do the same then your point would carry more weight. Where is my bulldozer that wipes the floor with anything intel sell, oh and where are those 600 million transistors they lost.

I think my point is if you believe everything you read then you are going to be dissapointed a lot nowdays.

 

[imaheadcase]

I don't care about CPU or graphics atm, i want some awesome new monitors for computer to come out.

 

[RavenSEAL]

If AMD didn't do the same then your point would carry more weight. Where is my bulldozer that wipes the floor with anything intel sell, oh and where are those 600 million transistors they lost.

I think my point is if you believe everything you read then you are going to be dissapointed a lot nowdays.

Wow...you Intel fanboys are quite on the defensive side of things nowadays. I haven't even mentioned AMD all day long...

 

[thm1223]

I don't care about CPU or graphics atm, i want some awesome new monitors for computer to come out.

Was there anything at CES about this?

 

[CHADBOGA]

http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/i...2011-20000726/

Intel are liars =(

They are going to be a bit late, mate. :whiste:

 

[TakeNoPrisoners]

It would probably be pretty easy to make a single core CPU that could hit 10GHz with todays tech. It would be almost useless as everything is multi-threaded.

There is no reason to make chips with those kind of clock speeds.

 

[Phynaz]

Intel will release theirs as soon as AMD announces a date for theirs:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20031016140742.html

Seems they are running a bit behind schedule

 

[Fox5]

It would probably be pretty easy to make a single core CPU that could hit 10GHz with todays tech. It would be almost useless as everything is multi-threaded.

There is no reason to make chips with those kind of clock speeds.

They probably could make a cpu that would hit 10Ghz...if it had a similar design to the P4. IT's total single threaded performance that matters, not the clock speed, and current cpus are probably pretty close to the max single threaded performance we could produce today. Remember, the limit is power output, not transistor count at this point.

 

[imaheadcase]

Was there anything at CES about this?

Not really, mostly TV related stuff.

 

[Smartazz]

that being said, the higher efficiency IPC multicore/thread CPUs we have now would smoke the 10GHz CPUs we otherwise would have had

This.

 

[sandorski]

It's basic math/logic.

EDIT: FYI, GHz is not all that matters. Ask AMD...

They were correct.

 

[Puppies04]

Wow...you Intel fanboys are quite on the defensive side of things nowadays. I haven't even mentioned AMD all day long...

I'm no intel fanboy, if bulldozer had the performance it was supposed to I would be typing this on an AMD rig right now. The point I was making was generic, companies lie/bend the truth (call it whichever you want) all the time.

 

[lamedude]

Its next to the 80 core CPU they also promised us. A 10GHZ 80 core CPU is more likey to happen than AMD getting 50% marketshare by 2015 though.