• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Where is intels 10GHz CPU they promised that would appear in 2011?

4ghz X 6 cores = 24 (effective) Ghz

maybe they can coin a new term eGhz (I hope not)


or for something more mainstream:
3 Ghz X 4 cores = 12 equivalent Ghz
 
Last edited:
Example:
AMD X6 1090T @ 4GHZ (6 Cores)
6 (Cores) x 4.0Ghz = 24Ghz
Click to expand...
It's basic math/logic.

facepalm.jpg


EDIT: FYI, GHz is not all that matters. Ask AMD...
 
RavenSEAL said:
And cheats during press conferences! :awe:
Click to expand...

If thats the as bad as intel cheats . I can live with it. I watched the video . I really don't see were the crime is Eden didn't even come close to pretending he was playing the game. Not in the video I watched. Anyone who thought that was a live demo has to be slow minded. Anand got to see the real demo . Which frankly surprised me . As intel is sitting on the IB IGP performance numbers . Just keep talking up the holy trinity and you will be deceived just like you were with BD. Intel has everthing well inhand.
 
Last edited:
Id like to see a 22nm original p4 with tri gate.i think they could hit 10ghz on a single core staying under 140 watts.

Back then mhz sold systems and now its about efficiency per clock
 
since when did prediction = promise?

that being said, the higher efficiency IPC multicore/thread CPUs we have now would smoke the 10GHz CPUs we otherwise would have had
 
RavenSEAL said:
And cheats during press conferences!
Click to expand...

If AMD didn't do the same then your point would carry more weight. Where is my bulldozer that wipes the floor with anything intel sell, oh and where are those 600 million transistors they lost.

I think my point is if you believe everything you read then you are going to be dissapointed a lot nowdays.
 
Puppies04 said:
If AMD didn't do the same then your point would carry more weight. Where is my bulldozer that wipes the floor with anything intel sell, oh and where are those 600 million transistors they lost.

I think my point is if you believe everything you read then you are going to be dissapointed a lot nowdays.
Click to expand...


Wow...you Intel fanboys are quite on the defensive side of things nowadays. I haven't even mentioned AMD all day long...🙄
 
It would probably be pretty easy to make a single core CPU that could hit 10GHz with todays tech. It would be almost useless as everything is multi-threaded.

There is no reason to make chips with those kind of clock speeds.
 
TakeNoPrisoners said:
It would probably be pretty easy to make a single core CPU that could hit 10GHz with todays tech. It would be almost useless as everything is multi-threaded.

There is no reason to make chips with those kind of clock speeds.
Click to expand...

They probably could make a cpu that would hit 10Ghz...if it had a similar design to the P4. IT's total single threaded performance that matters, not the clock speed, and current cpus are probably pretty close to the max single threaded performance we could produce today. Remember, the limit is power output, not transistor count at this point.
 
RavenSEAL said:
Wow...you Intel fanboys are quite on the defensive side of things nowadays. I haven't even mentioned AMD all day long...🙄
Click to expand...


I'm no intel fanboy, if bulldozer had the performance it was supposed to I would be typing this on an AMD rig right now. The point I was making was generic, companies lie/bend the truth (call it whichever you want) all the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top