I vote you for village idiot.Originally posted by: chin311
in my pants
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
It "lives" on your news service's servers, but expires kind of like sea monkies do. It propogates in real time, from provider to provider, based on a master list amongst the servers.
Originally posted by: chin311
in my pants
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
I vote you for village idiot.Originally posted by: chin311
in my pants
Because they've effectively been cleared of responsibility from earlier legal challenges. Odd, I know, given the current p2p climate.Originally posted by: LordJezo
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
It "lives" on your news service's servers, but expires kind of like sea monkies do. It propogates in real time, from provider to provider, based on a master list amongst the servers.
So why dont newsgroup providers get busted for having gigs and gigs of illegal software and files on their servers?
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
Because they've effectively been cleared of responsibility from earlier legal challenges. Odd, I know, given the current p2p climate.Originally posted by: LordJezo
Originally posted by: iwearnosox
It "lives" on your news service's servers, but expires kind of like sea monkies do. It propogates in real time, from provider to provider, based on a master list amongst the servers.
So why dont newsgroup providers get busted for having gigs and gigs of illegal software and files on their servers?
I don't think they're pursued further because of some grandfathering, and how "difficult" it is to extract copyrighted material vs. typical filesharing applications.
Originally posted by: LordJezo
That's strange.
They could shut down Napster because it stored things on its severs, a list of files, but newsgroups store the actual games and movies for people. Seems much worse to me.
Oh well.
Originally posted by: aves2k
Originally posted by: LordJezo
That's strange.
They could shut down Napster because it stored things on its severs, a list of files, but newsgroups store the actual games and movies for people. Seems much worse to me.
Oh well.
SHHHH! Don't attract attention!
Originally posted by: Antisocial-Virge
Originally posted by: aves2k
Originally posted by: LordJezo
That's strange.
They could shut down Napster because it stored things on its severs, a list of files, but newsgroups store the actual games and movies for people. Seems much worse to me.
Oh well.
SHHHH! Don't attract attention!
Exactly. Newsgroups seem like DOS. New computer people don't know about it and do not want to bother to learn it.
Originally posted by: royaldank
To answer the question, I think each group has a server. They are all shared to a master list of some sort and the large providers pull the message for the day. I think I remember seeing a guy that was running a newsgroup server in his kitchen. So, I think there are individual owners of the newsgroup on an individual machine. Several companies hit it, and spread it on down the chain. However much storage your provider has is how much retention you get. I'd guess the master server probably only keeps the message for 24 hours. Maybe that is how it's sliding under the law right now. No one really has the stuff since the provider is dropping it every so often.