ok ok. enough bs. I just left one of the largest cc issuers, one that has 30bn+ in outstanding balances. they make their money the following ways. consider that the total yield on a cc portfolio is 24%.
17% comes from interest
2% comes from interchange (netwoek use)
5% comes from late, overlimit...etc fees
now, to finance those receivables most companies create massive trusts and issue bonds backed by the assets (securitization, which is what I do). here is how the math breaks down.
7% direct funding costs to investors
8% net losses (gross losses net of recoveries)
.75% servicing fee paid to the servicer (cc companies either service the debt themselves or outsource)
.25% issuance costs, trustee fees...etc
so that is 16% funding costs. the remainder is excess spread, what they get to keep. apply that to 30bn, that is what they make.
float isn't huge since all funds that are applied to accounts in the trust have to be in the trust within 2-4 days usually. considering clearing times, even for ach, processing...etc, float isn't huge.
they also make money on other products, not to mention funfing by deposits rather than unsecured or secured debt. deposits are always cheaper after a certain point where regulatory capital relief is already had.
anyway, monoline or pure cc companies don't exist mostly anymore. mbna, the last pure monoline is now boa and capital one has purchased two large deposit/retail banks now.
I just had to chime in despite typing all of that on a ppc-6700 kb, which isn't easy. way too much fudd out there