Where can I find benchmarks for....

[foodfightr]

3000+ 754 vs 3000+

 

[biostud]

I don't think the low lvl s939 have been benched yet.

 

[Arcanedeath]

the 3000+ Skt 754 is 2ghz and the 939 one is 1.8Ghz they both have 512k of cache. dual channel memory does not make up for 200mhz in clockspeed the skt 754CPU is actualy FASTER than the 939 version at the same PR rating. AMD really needs to fix this. the 3000+ for 939 is really more like a 2900+

 

[Frew]

Originally posted by: Arcanedeath
the 3000+ Skt 754 is 2ghz and the 939 one is 1.8Ghz they both have 512k of cache. dual channel memory does not make up for 200mhz in clockspeed the skt 754CPU is actualy FASTER than the 939 version at the same PR rating. AMD really needs to fix this. the 3000+ for 939 is really more like a 2900+

Yea. Maybe AMD should use the same naming scheme as the new intel one.

 

[Budman]

Originally posted by: LeadFrog

Originally posted by: Arcanedeath
the 3000+ Skt 754 is 2ghz and the 939 one is 1.8Ghz they both have 512k of cache. dual channel memory does not make up for 200mhz in clockspeed the skt 754CPU is actualy FASTER than the 939 version at the same PR rating. AMD really needs to fix this. the 3000+ for 939 is really more like a 2900+

Yea. Maybe AMD should use the same naming scheme as the new intel one.

Yes there's also the Socket A 3000+ is it wasnt confusing enough.