Whenever the news posts about "White People With Guns" its usually scary or weird or monstrously stupid.

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Viper1j

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,169
3,645
136
KMFJD said:
www.ny1.com

St. Louis couple indicted for waving guns at protesters

A grand jury has indicted the St. Louis couple who displayed guns while hundreds of racial injustice protesters marched on their private street
www.ny1.com www.ny1.com

charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon and tampering with evidence
Click to expand...

Bitches should just thank God they're white and call it a day.

Any other color, they would be under the jail, or under the ground. :cool:

And they claim that the Second Amendment is for everyone, right?

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: hal2kilo, Amused and KMFJD
Fanatical Meat

Fanatical Meat

Lifer
Feb 4, 2009
34,554
15,766
136
woolfe9998 said:
Indictment sealed until tomorrow but very curious what the tampering with evidence charge is about.
Click to expand...

I am going to guess it will have something to do with their home security system/camera being deleted or parts of it deleted but the noobs don't understand that shit is backed up with google.
Just a guess
 
V

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,461
7,636
136
Lol ... The McCloskeys, the St. Louis couple who were photographed waving their guns at protesters, are suing the photographer for ruining their lives. In response, he has sent them at $1500 bill because they used the photo on their Christmas cards

nypost.com

Gun-toting St. Louis couple sue news photographer over infamous image

The St. Louis couple that shot to viral infamy when they pointed guns at Black Lives Matter protesters outside their mansion are accusing a news photographer of trespassing to capture a now-iconic …
nypost.com nypost.com

So they’re suing a photographer for accurately depicting them in a photograph? Yeah, that should work out great.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hal2kilo
B

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,074
23,948
136
Jhhnn said:
Details from the indictment-

www.kmov.com

Indictments allege McCloskeys altered pistol and 'obstructed prosecution'

A grand jury has indicted Mark and Patricia McCloskey Tuesday on charges of exhibiting guns at protesters in a June incident in their neighborhood.
www.kmov.com www.kmov.com

It's a very lawyerly confabulation to claim you weren't endangering anybody because you believed the gun wouldn't work...
Click to expand...
Its like trying to argue you didn't really rob the bank because the gun was a fake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo
allisolm

allisolm

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 2, 2001
24,983
4,314
136
KMFJD said:
www.ny1.com

St. Louis couple indicted for waving guns at protesters

A grand jury has indicted the St. Louis couple who displayed guns while hundreds of racial injustice protesters marched on their private street
www.ny1.com www.ny1.com

charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon and tampering with evidence
Click to expand...

The couple pled guilty to misdemeanor charges. Mark McCloskey pled guilty to fourth-degree assault and faces a $750 fine. Patricia McCloskey pled guilty to second-degree harassment and must pay a $2,000 fine, according to court documents. As part of the plea agreement, Mark and Patricia McCloskey agreed to surrender their handgun and semi-automatic rifle.

Hopefully they had to spend a great deal of money on legal representation.

www.cnn.com

St. Louis couple who waved guns at protesters last summer plead guilty to misdemeanor charges | CNN

The St. Louis couple who made headlines last year for pointing their guns at people protesting near their home pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges, according to court documents obtained from the city of St. Louis on Thursday.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
Torn Mind

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
11,636
2,650
136
allisolm said:
The couple pled guilty to misdemeanor charges. Mark McCloskey pled guilty to fourth-degree assault and faces a $750 fine. Patricia McCloskey pled guilty to second-degree harassment and must pay a $2,000 fine, according to court documents. As part of the plea agreement, Mark and Patricia McCloskey agreed to surrender their handgun and semi-automatic rifle.

Hopefully they had to spend a great deal of money on legal representation.

www.cnn.com

St. Louis couple who waved guns at protesters last summer plead guilty to misdemeanor charges | CNN

The St. Louis couple who made headlines last year for pointing their guns at people protesting near their home pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges, according to court documents obtained from the city of St. Louis on Thursday.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
Click to expand...
Plea bargains are basically the rational choice in most instances.
Court system and its associates doesn't care where the money comes from as long as they have it. You make them try you and you can expect a much greater world of hurt if you do get convicted.

My mom was the rare bird who foregone the plea option and went through to trial and the jury acquitted. No, she didn't kill anyone or did some "crime" you expect. Rather, the state wanted to call her an elder abuser.
 
Fanatical Meat

Fanatical Meat

Lifer
Feb 4, 2009
34,554
15,766
136
allisolm said:
The couple pled guilty to misdemeanor charges. Mark McCloskey pled guilty to fourth-degree assault and faces a $750 fine. Patricia McCloskey pled guilty to second-degree harassment and must pay a $2,000 fine, according to court documents. As part of the plea agreement, Mark and Patricia McCloskey agreed to surrender their handgun and semi-automatic rifle.

Hopefully they had to spend a great deal of money on legal representation.

www.cnn.com

St. Louis couple who waved guns at protesters last summer plead guilty to misdemeanor charges | CNN

The St. Louis couple who made headlines last year for pointing their guns at people protesting near their home pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges, according to court documents obtained from the city of St. Louis on Thursday.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
Click to expand...

Sounds like a fair compromise imo
 
soundforbjt

soundforbjt

Lifer
Feb 15, 2002
17,787
6,035
136
allisolm said:
The couple pled guilty to misdemeanor charges. Mark McCloskey pled guilty to fourth-degree assault and faces a $750 fine. Patricia McCloskey pled guilty to second-degree harassment and must pay a $2,000 fine, according to court documents. As part of the plea agreement, Mark and Patricia McCloskey agreed to surrender their handgun and semi-automatic rifle.

Hopefully they had to spend a great deal of money on legal representation.

www.cnn.com

St. Louis couple who waved guns at protesters last summer plead guilty to misdemeanor charges | CNN

The St. Louis couple who made headlines last year for pointing their guns at people protesting near their home pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges, according to court documents obtained from the city of St. Louis on Thursday.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
Click to expand...
They'll just go buy some more guns, maybe they already have more than those two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and ch33zw1z
F

FireMarshallBill

Member
Feb 28, 2021
26
61
61
soundforbjt said:
They'll just go buy some more guns, maybe they already have more than those two.
Click to expand...

Can I subscribe to your newsletter?

McCloskeys get new guns after firearms confiscation
Sun, June 20, 2021, 4:06 PM

The St. Louis couple who brandished weapons while staring down Black Lives Matter demonstrators have gotten new weapons to replace their confiscated firearms.
Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who days ago pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges for aiming guns at protesters in June 2020 at the height of the protests after George Floyd's death, have gotten new AR-15-style guns to replace the firearms state authorities will destroy as part of their plea bargains.
"Checking out my new AR!" Mark McCloskey wrote in a tweet Saturday, along with the hashtags "#2A," in reference to the Second Amendment, and "#MOSen," acknowledging his Senate candidacy.
Click to expand...

 
  • Like
Reactions: soundforbjt
E

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
9,012
4,334
136
What wacked out ruling to confiscate guns doesn't include a ban of owning anymore guns during their probation if not for life? Oh yeah the stupid 2nd amendment
 
  • Like
Reactions: dainthomas and soundforbjt
ch33zw1z

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
37,760
18,039
146
eelw said:
What wacked out ruling to confiscate guns doesn't include a ban of owning anymore guns during their probation if not for life? Oh yeah the stupid 2nd amendment
Click to expand...

I don't see how that would guarantee a free state or a militia membership 😉
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom