When too little depth of field is a bad idea

JohnnyRebel

Senior member
Feb 7, 2011
762
0
0
That is terrible for a product shot.

I, personally, don't like it when the dof is too shallow for portraits.

For instance, the girl carries this photo but I hate how her ear, one eye and lips are losing focus because of the too shallow dof.

JR

portrait.jpg
 
Last edited:

mooncancook

Platinum Member
May 28, 2003
2,874
50
91
I used to take photos of my scale model cars and bikes with a p&s that look just like that and I wondered how people were able to take close-up photos of these tiny models with everything in focus.
 

Throckmorton

Lifer
Aug 23, 2007
16,829
3
0
I used to take photos of my scale model cars and bikes with a p&s that look just like that and I wondered how people were able to take close-up photos of these tiny models with everything in focus.

With the p&s wouldn't more be in focus?
 

RobDickinson

Senior member
Jan 6, 2011
317
4
0
How to get it all in focus?

Stop down some, but then you push diffraction and lighting.

Use multiple images and focus stack a very big thing in the small world of macro especially with the mpe65 etc

Use a tilt shift lens and tilt the plane of focus, a lot of product shots are done this way.
 

angry hampster

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2007
4,232
0
0
www.lexaphoto.com
How to get it all in focus?

Stop down some, but then you push diffraction and lighting.

Use multiple images and focus stack a very big thing in the small world of macro especially with the mpe65 etc

Use a tilt shift lens and tilt the plane of focus, a lot of product shots are done this way.

F/16 would have covered this fine with an appropriate lens (50-75mm) with no noticeable diffraction.