When Kerry's numbers go up so do Terrorism Alerts from the Bush Campaign??

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...4Oct6?language=printer
Bush Aide ADMITS>>>"The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."


http://americablog.blogspot.co...tml#109717327763260371

Aides admit Bush stoking fears of terrorism for political gain
by John in DC - 10/7/2004 02:42:32 PM

UPDATE: I cannot believe this. The Bushies have just issued a terror warning about, you guessed it, Al Qaeda is coming to kill your kids in school. Gee, isn't it an amazing coincidence that the polls showed just a few weeks ago that "security moms" were freaked about the Russian school killings and that such security moms were more prone to vote for Bush because of the killings. And now we have the Bushies telling America's moms, out of the blue, once Bush's numbers are falling, that Al Qaeda is coming after your pre-schooler. No warning on this 7 WEEKS AGO WHEN THE KILLINGS ACTUALLY HAPPENED. No, the warning comes now, right before the election. These guys are scum.

Read this little tidbit buried in a front page Washington Post story today. According to Bush's aides, regarding the "big speech" he gave yesterday, "The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."

 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
here come the liberal conspiracy theories. It couldn't be possible that they are actually try to keep the country safter...nah, it HAS to be political.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Yeah, I put a lot of stock in sites that call themselves blogs. Look at the list of keywords for the site - gives you some idea of the credibility.
blog election us americablog aravosis debate political politics dick cheney bio gay united states american democratic left michelle malkin progressive liberal john democrat pundit tv web log homosexual glbt lesbian lgbt queer mary ads advertisement
What a joke.
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Yeah, I put a lot of stock in sites that call themselves blogs. Look at the list of keywords for the site - gives you some idea of the credibility.
blog election us americablog aravosis debate political politics dick cheney bio gay united states american democratic left michelle malkin progressive liberal john democrat pundit tv web log homosexual glbt lesbian lgbt queer mary ads advertisement
What a joke.


Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...4Oct6?language=printer
Bush Aide ADMITS>>>"The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."
 

ntdz

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
6,989
0
0
and what does the washington post article have to do w/ the terror alert raising being political?
 

dbk

Lifer
Apr 23, 2004
17,685
10
81
Originally posted by: ntdz
and what does the washington post article have to do w/ the terror alert raising being political?

I think OP was referring to the following from the Washington Post article:

A Bush adviser said the president hopes to change the dynamics of the race with more biting attacks on Kerry's record and trustworthiness and on what Bush charges is Kerry's reluctance to use U.S. military force to defeat terrorism. The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism, raising new concerns about Kerry's ability to protect Americans and reinforcing Bush's image as the steady anti-terrorism candidate, aides said.

"Senator Kerry approaches the war with a September the 10th mind-set . . . that any attack will be met with a swift and certain response," Bush said. "That was the mind-set of the 1990s, while al Qaeda was planning the attacks on America. After September the 11th, our object in the war on terror is not to wait for the next attack and respond but to prevent attacks by taking the fight to the enemy."

 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Topic Title: When Kerry's numbers go up so do Terrorism Alerts from the Bush Campaign??
Topic Summary: Bush team USING TERRORISM ALERTS FOR POLITICAL GAIN

Originally posted by: dahunan
Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...4Oct6?language=printer
Bush Aide ADMITS>>>"The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."
You might want to check out the article. The word "strategy" in that sentence refers to "more biting attacks on Kerry's record and trustworthiness and on what Bush charges is Kerry's reluctance to use U.S. military force to defeat terrorism" and not anything involving terror alerts.

 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
Fvcking liberals. I'm seriously tired of this bullshit.

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Fvcking liberals. I'm seriously tired of this bullshit.

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.

Neither do you so STFU. :roll: The correlation is real. Maybe it is a coincidence. Maybe it is crass manipulation of weak minded sheep. You will never know unless you stop the blind worship and start thinking for yourself.


----------------------
Bush Apologists of America (BAA): pulling the wool over America's eyes since 1980
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Fvcking liberals. I'm seriously tired of this bullshit.

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.

Neither do you so STFU. :roll: The correlation is real. Maybe it is a coincidence. Maybe it is crass manipulation of weak minded sheep. You will never know unless you stop the blind worship and start thinking for yourself.


----------------------
Bush Apologists of America (BAA): pulling the wool over America's eyes since 1980

Hmm, do some analytical thinking. Check where I live (below), figure out which Americans generally live in that location, then reassess your idiotic comments about what I may or may not know. You haven't been here all that long so I'll chalk it up to ignorance, not stupidity.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
hey, it worked in making us think we had to go to Iraq.

What they will do is keep toying with alerts while saying we are safe. I saw a special on how they handled Iraq. While interviewing a psychiatrist, the concept is simple. Create two conflicting views and people become fearful. So, they will change alert levels and say Bush is winning the war.

If only people knew.
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
How can anyone, with a straight faced, mock someone for going anywhere near a conspiracy and this White House. This is the White House that orchestrated a war and manipulated the masses with fearmongering. Yes, they actually started a war and killed thousands of innocent people for no reason at all except their desire for more power.

Of course Bush is using terrorism alerts to rally support. Fear his main staple. He's a fascist.

And maybe if you didn't think all newspapers were part of a "liberal conspiracy" you'd actually read the article.
 

Ldir

Platinum Member
Jul 23, 2003
2,184
0
0
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Fvcking liberals. I'm seriously tired of this bullshit.

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.

Neither do you so STFU. :roll: The correlation is real. Maybe it is a coincidence. Maybe it is crass manipulation of weak minded sheep. You will never know unless you stop the blind worship and start thinking for yourself.


----------------------
Bush Apologists of America (BAA): pulling the wool over America's eyes since 1980

Hmm, do some analytical thinking. Check where I live (below), figure out which Americans generally live in that location, then reassess your idiotic comments about what I may or may not know. You haven't been here all that long so I'll chalk it up to ignorance, not stupidity.

Thank you anyway. I will stick to recognized sources of information. You would not be the first guy on the Internet with a James Bond fantasy or the first grunt who thinks he is a general. You also miss the point. The timing is suspicious. Whenever Dub's ratings drop, they annouce a new terror warning. They control the timing.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Fvcking liberals. I'm seriously tired of this bullshit.

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.
Neither do you so STFU. :roll: The correlation is real. Maybe it is a coincidence. Maybe it is crass manipulation of weak minded sheep. You will never know unless you stop the blind worship and start thinking for yourself.


----------------------
Bush Apologists of America (BAA): pulling the wool over America's eyes since 1980
Hmm, do some analytical thinking. Check where I live (below), figure out which Americans generally live in that location, then reassess your idiotic comments about what I may or may not know. You haven't been here all that long so I'll chalk it up to ignorance, not stupidity.
Thank you anyway. I will stick to recognized sources of information. You would not be the first guy on the Internet with a James Bond fantasy or the first grunt who thinks he is a general. You also miss the point. The timing is suspicious. Whenever Dub's ratings drop, they annouce a new terror warning. They control the timing.
Correlation doesn't prove the original accusation: "Bush team USING TERRORISM ALERTS FOR POLITICAL GAIN"
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Originally posted by: AndrewR

Hmm, do some analytical thinking. Check where I live (below), figure out which Americans generally live in that location, then reassess your idiotic comments about what I may or may not know. You haven't been here all that long so I'll chalk it up to ignorance, not stupidity.

I find it laughable you think your living in Japan gives you a free pass on not being a sheep. You are not the first person to live abroad. Get over yourself (especially if you're in a military base that is basically an equivalent to a little American enclave overseas).

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.

Has Japan helped with your anger problem? We have had access to the intelligence. It turns out the previous intelligence driving these Orwellian alerts was based on ancient intelligence. If you put 2 + 2 together, you'll realize that the only reason to resurrect defunct intelligence is to scare sheep, whether they're in an overseas or not.
 

AndrewR

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
11,157
0
0
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Originally posted by: AndrewR

Hmm, do some analytical thinking. Check where I live (below), figure out which Americans generally live in that location, then reassess your idiotic comments about what I may or may not know. You haven't been here all that long so I'll chalk it up to ignorance, not stupidity.

I find it laughable you think your living in Japan gives you a free pass on not being a sheep. You are not the first person to live abroad. Get over yourself (especially if you're in a military base that is basically an equivalent to a little American enclave overseas).

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.

Has Japan helped with your anger problem? We have had access to the intelligence. It turns out the previous intelligence driving these Orwellian alerts was based on ancient intelligence. If you put 2 + 2 together, you'll realize that the only reason to resurrect defunct intelligence is to scare sheep, whether they're in an overseas or not.

I find it laughable that you are as thick as you portray in writing. Shocker -- I'm not the first person to live abroad??? Really??? Wow, you ARE smart. You seem to know about overseas basing the living arrangements -- care to enlighten the board on which installations you've visited? None? That's what I thought. Of course, you missed the entire point of my post, but that's not surprising.

As for the "ancient intelligence", did you catch the part about the recent intelligence coming from Iraq? Did you happen to see the story about Beslan (that's the town with the terrorist attack on the school in Russia -- don't want to confuse you)? Geez, that happened, what? -- a few weeks ago? Ancient!

Originally posted by: Ldir
I will stick to recognized sources of information. You would not be the first guy on the Internet with a James Bond fantasy or the first grunt who thinks he is a general. You also miss the point. The timing is suspicious.

Stick to your recognized sources of information because I'm certainly not giving any information out. Your sources of information appear to be conspiracy theorists though so you might want to look with a more jaundiced eye. Also, I neither have a James Bond fantasy nor am I grunt or general. That's as much as I'll disclose. As for the timing, see my comments above regarding Iraq and Beslan. If an alert comes out regarding overseas American hotels after the Egyptian bombing, is that also suspicious?

You also seem to be a reasonable person so I apologize for flying a bit off the handle earlier. Been stressful at work lately. :)
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Sounds like another liberal reporter taking some "liberties" with a source. I don't see this as a direct quote, and nobody is quoted. I seriously doubt any bush aid is going to say "we're stoking fears!" But of course, dahunan would fall for it hook, line and sinker.
 

bigal40

Senior member
Sep 7, 2004
849
0
0
Originally posted by: dahunan
Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...4Oct6?language=printer
Bush Aide ADMITS>>>"The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."


http://americablog.blogspot.co...tml#109717327763260371

Aides admit Bush stoking fears of terrorism for political gain
by John in DC - 10/7/2004 02:42:32 PM

UPDATE: I cannot believe this. The Bushies have just issued a terror warning about, you guessed it, Al Qaeda is coming to kill your kids in school. Gee, isn't it an amazing coincidence that the polls showed just a few weeks ago that "security moms" were freaked about the Russian school killings and that such security moms were more prone to vote for Bush because of the killings. And now we have the Bushies telling America's moms, out of the blue, once Bush's numbers are falling, that Al Qaeda is coming after your pre-schooler. No warning on this 7 WEEKS AGO WHEN THE KILLINGS ACTUALLY HAPPENED. No, the warning comes now, right before the election. These guys are scum.

Read this little tidbit buried in a front page Washington Post story today. According to Bush's aides, regarding the "big speech" he gave yesterday, "The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."


I don't hink the disks found in Iraq and the school killings in russia were related. THat is why they were 7 weeks apart. I think bush is doing the right thing when the terror alert level is raised because if he doesn't raise it and an attack occurs he'll get it from you liberals for not having raised the terror alert and was therfore responsible for the attack. Kind of like the way you say 9/11 was his fault. Either way bush is in for a bashing from the liberals
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: bigal40
Originally posted by: dahunan
Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...4Oct6?language=printer
Bush Aide ADMITS>>>"The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."


http://americablog.blogspot.co...tml#109717327763260371

Aides admit Bush stoking fears of terrorism for political gain
by John in DC - 10/7/2004 02:42:32 PM

UPDATE: I cannot believe this. The Bushies have just issued a terror warning about, you guessed it, Al Qaeda is coming to kill your kids in school. Gee, isn't it an amazing coincidence that the polls showed just a few weeks ago that "security moms" were freaked about the Russian school killings and that such security moms were more prone to vote for Bush because of the killings. And now we have the Bushies telling America's moms, out of the blue, once Bush's numbers are falling, that Al Qaeda is coming after your pre-schooler. No warning on this 7 WEEKS AGO WHEN THE KILLINGS ACTUALLY HAPPENED. No, the warning comes now, right before the election. These guys are scum.

Read this little tidbit buried in a front page Washington Post story today. According to Bush's aides, regarding the "big speech" he gave yesterday, "The strategy is aimed at stoking public fears about terrorism..."


I don't hink the disks found in Iraq and the school killings in russia were related. THat is why they were 7 weeks apart. I think bush is doing the right thing when the terror alert level is raised because if he doesn't raise it and an attack occurs he'll get it from you liberals for not having raised the terror alert and was therfore responsible for the attack. Kind of like the way you say 9/11 was his fault. Either way bush is in for a bashing from the liberals


Using the alert isn't a bad thing in of itself, but it seems to use it for poltical gain as well. Remember, right after the DNC, they jacked up the level again and when Kerry (on a couple of occasions) had some momentum in the poll, they raised the level again. I can't say that with 100% certainty but that's been the impression it has been leaving to not just myself, to a lot of people as well.
 

Commodus

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2004
9,215
6,820
136
It's hard to discount the possiblity that the terror alerts are orchestrated for the sake of keeping approval ratings up. Consider these:

1. the aforementioned graph showing Bush's approval ratings falling until the terror level is raised

2. that there's often some knock on the Bush administration's credibility shortly before the alert is raised

3. the alert level has never gone below yellow in 3 years (though the fraudulent 2003 Iraq war has guaranteed increased terrorist activity)

4. it's fairly well-acknowledged that Bush has seriously neglected domestic policy (like the No Child Left Behind policy that left children behind, going from a huge projected surplus to a huge deficit in less than 4 years, or eroding civil rights via the Patriot Act). He needs you to be worried about outside threats so that you don't pay attention to what's going wrong on your own soil.

Now don't get me wrong, there's always the possiblity that the alert level changes were largely coincidental, but it would be wrong to trust any government so explicitly in such a matter when you know what they stand to gain from it.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Fvcking liberals. I'm seriously tired of this bullshit.

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.
Neither do you so STFU. :roll: The correlation is real. Maybe it is a coincidence. Maybe it is crass manipulation of weak minded sheep. You will never know unless you stop the blind worship and start thinking for yourself.


This---------- 'correlation' 'real' or 'coincidence'....thing...
If you go back and look at amdfanboy's cute little picture, you would come to a conclusion that even before the "Russian school killings" there was a correlation / coincidence thing going on.


It is quite the telling tale of the publics,,,, errr,, sheeps (as you perceive them) perception of the two candidates.

I really wish that Kerry would run with this story....
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Ldir
Originally posted by: AndrewR
Fvcking liberals. I'm seriously tired of this bullshit.

FACT: You have no idea what you're talking about. You do not have access to the intelligence which drives terror alerts so STFU.

Neither do you so STFU. :roll: The correlation is real. Maybe it is a coincidence. Maybe it is crass manipulation of weak minded sheep. You will never know unless you stop the blind worship and start thinking for yourself.


----------------------
Bush Apologists of America (BAA): pulling the wool over America's eyes since 1980

Maybe they have specific intelligence about terror attacks as we get closer to the election, which they friggin told us. Grow up. Are you people even old enough to vote?
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,762
6,768
126
Elections can be dangerous times for the Bush Administration. I'm sure they'll see that in the data as projected chatter. :D
 

GrGr

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2003
3,204
1
76

Timeline with chart detailing the terror alerts and their "coincidence" with dips in Bush's popularity ratings:

Timeline of Terror Alerts - link

Biltud, from Salon.com's TableTalk, posted a few days ago a series of correlations between past terror alerts and political events unfavorable to the Bush administration. I compiled all these correlations and organized them chronologically into a timeline. I also added additional news items and other instances that I found out, detailing the terror alerts over the last few years, and located the original sources for many of these news articles. Soon, Biltud and I started to research together all these occurrences, and more interesting "coincidences" started to appear. We finally built this timeline of terror alerts and how they relate to the news headlines of the days immediately prior to that very alert. I think it's very easy to see a pattern recurring (Text in blue marks the original notes by Biltud. Text and sources in black are my additions):


January 10, 2002 - George W. Bush, answering reporters' questions in the Oval Office regarding his close relationship with Ken Lay, head of the controversial Enron, claims that he barely knew him: "I got to know Ken Lay when he was the head of the?what they call the Governor's Business Council in Texas. He was a supporter of Ann Richards in my run in 1994 [italics Chatterbox's]. And she had named him the head of the Governor's Business Council. And I decided to leave him in place, just for the sake of continuity. And that's when I first got to know Ken. ?" Source

Many see Bush's answer as less than sincere. Source - Source

February 5, 2002 - Angry lawmakers to subpoena Ken Lay over Enron scandal. Journalists inquire about Lay's close connections to the Bush administration Source

February 12, 2002 - Attorney General John Ashcroft on Tuesday called on "all Americans to be on the highest state of alert" after an FBI warning of a possible imminent terrorist attack. Source


May 22, 2002 -- Bush goes on the record as opposing the formation of an independent commission to look into why 9/11 happened.

Mr. Bush's comments come after a two-day hearing on Capitol Hill with FBI director Robert Mueller and the agent who wrote the so-called "Phoenix memo" last summer warning about that Arab students training at U.S. aviation schools were linked to a militant Muslim group. Source - Source

Same day:

The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee votes to issue subpoenas to the Bush administration for information on its contacts with bankrupt energy trader Enron Corp. Source

May 24, 2002 - Railroad and other transit systems across the country received a Transportation Department warning based on "an unconfirmed, uncorroborated report", and were told to "remain in a heightened state of alert". Earlier this week, the government issued warnings about the Statue of Liberty and the Brooklyn Bridge, leading to tightened security at an around those New York City locations. Source


June 9, 2002 -- FBI Whistleblower Talks To Congress
Coleen Rowley testifies she had tried to notify her superiors about the suspicious flight students before 9/11. She compared the agency's bureaucracy to the "Little Shop Of Horrors," telling Congress the FBI could have done more to prevent the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Source

June 10, 2002 - Attorney General John Ashcroft conducts an unusual and urgent press conference from Russia. He announces that they had arrested Jose Padilla, the "dirty bomb" suspect had been captured, and transferred to the custody of the DOD from the Justice Department. Source

In the same press conference Ashcroft revealed that the "dirty bomb" suspect had been captured on May 8th and held incognito before the announcement on June 10.


September 20, 2002 -- In the wake of damaging Congressional 9/11 inquiry revelations, President Bush reverses course and backs efforts by many lawmakers to form an independent commission to conduct a broader investigation than the current Congressional inquiry.

The White House also refuses to turn over documents showing what Bush knew before 9/11.

September 20, 2002 -- Relatives of 9/11 victims grill the Bush Administration over their reluctance to get to the bottom of it. Source

September 21, 2002 -- The Pentagon completes and delivers to President Bush a highly detailed set of military options for attacking Iraq, said the New York Times, quoting Pentagon and White House officials on Saturday.

The president has options now, and he has not made any decisions," states Ari Fleischer. Source

September 23, 2002 -- Former Vice President Al Gore warns that President Bush's doctrine allowing for a "pre-emptive" strike against Iraq could create a global "reign of fear." Source

September 23, 2002 -- Victory for German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and his ruling coalition came after a campaign in which he emphasized his strong opposition to a US war with Iraq. Source

September 10-24, 2002 - The attorney general elevates the terror alert. Later on, b Based on a review of intelligence and an assessment of threats by the intelligence community, as well as the passing of the anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks and the disruption of potential terrorist operations in the United States and abroad, the Attorney General in consultation with the Homeland Security Council has made the decision to return the threat level to an elevated risk of terrorist attack, or "yellow" level. Source


February 6, 2003 -- Powell pleads with the UN Security Council for a first strike against Iraq. Source

February 9, 2003 - Citing credible threats that al Qaeda might be planning attacks on American targets, the U.S. government raised the national color-coded threat level Friday to orange, indicating a "high" risk of a terrorist attack. Source

Note: In what has become since an object of jokes and derision, the Department of Homeland Security urged citizens to stock up on plastic sheets and duct tape "in case of a chemical attack." Source

Note 2: Also keep in mind that they raised the alert level quickly after numerous anti-war organizations declared their intention to march against the plans to invade Iraq. In New York city, where nearly one million citizens voiced their opposition to the war plans, the level was placed in heightened orange alert just on time for the massive demonstrations of February 15, 2003. Source - Source -

Later news reveal that some of the previous terror alerts may have been based in false information. Source


May 12, 2003 -- Jay Garner, the retired lieutenant general who was the top civil administrator in Iraq, left his post and other senior officials were also replaced. Source

May 20, 2003 - The United States raises the nation's terror threat level Tuesday, saying the U.S. intelligence community believes al Qaeda has entered an "operational period worldwide" and might attack within the US. Source


July 25, 2003 -- After the Bush administration delayed its publication for months, Congress releases its 9/11 findings. The government also deletes 28 pages of the report believed to detail Saudi funding of members of Al Qaeda in the Untied States prior to Sept. 11. Source - Source

July 28, 2003 -- US troops charged with beating Iraqi POWs. Source

Same day - 15 US soldiers die over 8 days in Iraq. Source

July 29 - Department of Homeland Security issues a warning about the possibility of suicide attacks on airplanes. Source


August 18, 2003 -- President Bush admits that major combat operations are continuing in Iraq. On May 1, Bush went on national TV to proclaim the end "major combat operations." Source

September 4, 2003 -- Both The New York Times and Vanity Fair start investigating the very damaging allegations that Top White House officials personally approved the evacuation of dozens of influential Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from the United States in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks when most flights were still grounded, a former White House adviser said today. Source

September 5, 2003 - A Department of Homeland Security advisory warns that al Qaeda is working on plans to hijack airliners flying between international points that pass near or over the continental United States. Source


December 18, 2003 -- 9/11 Chair Thomas Kean says the attacks were preventable. Source

Dec. 19 2003 -- A federal appeals court ruled the government can not detain U.S. citizen Jose Padilla indefinitely without pressing charges against him or allowing him access to the courts. Source

Same day -- The Wall Street Journal reports that auditors at the Pentagon are accusing Halliburton of refusing to hand over internal documents related to allegations that the oil service company overcharged the U.S. government in Iraq. Source

Same day -- David Kay quits, having found no WMDs. Source

Dec. 21, 2003 - Ridge raises the terror threat level just in time for the holidays. Source


March 15, 2004 -- Military families organize together to oppose the war. Source

March 16, 2004 -- Dems call for probe on Medicare cost cover-up. Source

March 17, 2004 -- Condoleeza opts of 9/11 Commission hearings. She repeats her refusal several times during the week, and later on appears on "60 Minutes" to explain her position. Source

March 18, 2004 - News report that a "high target" Al Qaeda leader has been "sorrouded" in the border with Pakistan. Cnn suggests it may be Bin Laden or al-Zawahri. Source Reports of fierce fighting continue. Source After the fighting ends, it is reported that it wasn't any "high value" target in the battle after all. Source

March 21, 2004 The State Department issues a terror alert. Source


March 21, 2004 -- Richard Clarke gives an exclusive to 60 Minutes about his book ?Against All Enemies? just days before he is due to testify before the 9/11 Commission.

"In the aftermath of Sept. 11, President Bush ordered his then top anti-terrorism adviser to look for a link between Iraq and the attacks, despite being told there didn't seem to be one. The charge comes from the adviser, Richard Clarke, in an exclusive interview on 60 Minutes." Source

March 30, 2004 -- Rice continues to refuse to testify publicly in front of 9/11 Commission. Source

April 1, 2004 -- US contractors killed and mutilated in Iraq. Source

Same Day ? The Pentagon issues a report that medical evacuations in Iraq hit 18,000. Source

Same day. Bush refuses to release Clinton papers to 9/11 Commission. Source

Also same day, Richard Clarke is all over the news. Source

April 2, 2004 - A bulletin sent from the FBI & Homeland Security warn of terrorists that may try to bomb buses and rail lines in major U.S. cities this summer. Source


May 10, 2004 -- Bush approval rating hits lowest point (46%) - Source

May 18, 2004 -- Colin Powell tells Meet the Press that he was deliberately mislead about WMD information. Powell's aide tries to cut him off mid-air. Source

May 18, 2004 ? Former Abu Ghraib Intel Staffer Says Army Concealed Involvement in Abu Ghraib Abuse Scandal. Source

May 19, 2004 -- Newsweek reports that President Bush's top lawyer warned two years ago that Bush could be prosecuted for war crimes as a result of how his administration was fighting the war on terror. Source

Same day ? White House stonewalls UN on papers about Halliburton?s contracts in Iraq. Source

Same day ? Tom Ridge testifies before 9/11 Commission on this second day of hearings in NYC. Source

Same day - The 9/11 Commission begins another round of hearings in NYC. Source

May 19, 2004 -- Nothing but bad news about prisoner abuse in Iraq, including breaking news that the Pentagon was told about the abuses back in November. Source

Senate Armed Forces Committee holds hearings on Abu Ghraib abuses. Source

May 25, 2004 - Homeland Security issues a terror alert: Major terror attack possible this summer. Source

June 7, 2004 -- The Wall Street Journal publishes exclusive report demonstrating that the Pentagon provided legal rationales and loopholes in 2003 to use torture and methods of near-torture, and how to avoid various international treaties and US laws. Furthermore, the leaked memos suggest that they circumvent US and international laws, the US president should change the rules as they may see fit. All media outlets pick up on this explosive report. Source - Source

June 14, 2004 - VP Dick Cheney is caught lying about the alleged ties of Saddam Hussein to al Qaeda. Cheney is unable to provide any evidence to his assertions after journalists inquire. On June 15 Bush Bush defends Cheney's unsourced assertions but does not provide any evidence either that there was a "link" between Iraq and al Qaeda or the 9/11 attacks. Source

June 15, 2004 - The Justice Department announces to the press they have thwarted an imminent terror plot to bomb malls in Ohio. Somali immigrant arrested and charged on the case.Source

Later on it is revealed that the Somali immigrant had been arrested one year earlier for his connections to terrorism, but there was nothing "imminent" in that case. The suspect was arrested in Nov. 28, 2003, and the Court papers filed by the government allege that a plot dated to March 2000. His indictment wasn't announced until June 15, 2004. Source - Source

July 6, 2004 -- Kerry names Edwards as his running mate. Source

July 8, 2004 - Tom Ridge holds a press conference on terror alerts over the summer and during the conventions. Source

July 11, 2004 -- Senior White House officials discuss the possibility of delaying the elections in case of a terrorist attack. Source


July 22, 2004 -- The 9/11 Commission releases their findings. While many criticize the commission for not going far enough, their report includes many examples of inaction and lack of leadership from the Bush administration. Source

July 26-29 -- Democratic Convention shows party unity and strong leadership. Kerry/Edwards provide electrifying acceptance speeches. John Kerry's acceptance speech is praised even by some conservative analysts. Campaign appearances immediately following the convention draw larger-than-expected crowds.

August 1, 2004 -- White House Projects Highest Deficit Ever. Source

August 2, 2004 - The Department of Homeland Security raises the terror alert at several large financial institutions in the New York City and Washington areas. Source

Later it is revealed that much of the information that led the authorities to raise the terror alert was three or four years old. Source


Same day - Bush's daughters, Jenna and Barbara, visit the Citicorp Building in New York City. This is one of the buildings that Tom Ridge implied was under a dire and imminent threat from terrorists. It seems odd that the President's daughters would be allowed to visit a building supposedly about to be attacked by terrorists. Source