When is RAM too much?

Stiganator

Platinum Member
Oct 14, 2001
2,492
3
81
I have heard that after a certain amount of RAM it begins to slow your system down. How much is that?
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
That problem was pretty much solved with on die L2 cache, before that it was chipset dependant.
 

Locutus4657

Senior member
Oct 9, 2001
209
0
0


<< That problem was pretty much solved with on die L2 cache, before that it was chipset dependant. >>



This problem affected Intels socket 7 chipset (can't remember the whole name, beleived it ended in LX). Other than that one exception (memory > 64MB slowed the system down) the general rule is more memory will only speed your system up. Of course for the average user the benifit begins to level off at a certain point as you can easily end up having more memory than you can use, but certainly in the world of the high end, more memory always equals more preformance.
 

CTho9305

Elite Member
Jul 26, 2000
9,214
1
81
for win9x/me, dont go above, uh, 512 I think. But then again, if you have a lot of ram and want a good system, you shouldn't be running 9x anyway ;)
 

CTho9305

Elite Member
Jul 26, 2000
9,214
1
81
oh, and don't get more than 4 gig ;)
(its a joke. 32-bit can only address 4 gig unless you work magic)
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81


<< This problem affected Intels socket 7 chipset (can't remember the whole name, beleived it ended in LX). Other than that one exception (memory > 64MB slowed the system down) the general rule is more memory will only speed your system up. Of course for the average user the benifit begins to level off at a certain point as you can easily end up having more memory than you can use, but certainly in the world of the high end, more memory always equals more preformance. >>



It affected the entire 430*X line at 64MB with the exception of the NX and HX when equipped with 512kB L2 cache (w/ TAGRAM). It also affects the Ali5 (at 128MB). Putting a K6-2+, K6-3, or K6-3+ allows you to cache the maximum amount of RAM that the chipset can handle. This is due to the on die L2 cache.

...yes, I have seen the effects, it is VERY noticable.
 

Locutus4657

Senior member
Oct 9, 2001
209
0
0


<< oh, and don't get more than 4 gig ;)
(its a joke. 32-bit can only address 4 gig unless you work magic)
>>



Current generation x86 32bit CPU's have a 36bit memory bus allowing them to address up to 64GB however accessing this much in code becomes messy.
 

CTho9305

Elite Member
Jul 26, 2000
9,214
1
81


<<

<< oh, and don't get more than 4 gig ;)
(its a joke. 32-bit can only address 4 gig unless you work magic)
>>



Current generation x86 32bit CPU's have a 36bit memory bus allowing them to address up to 64GB however accessing this much in code becomes messy.
>>



yeah, the linux kernel has a special option for boxes with >4gig