How was that a joke? Did anyone else think he was kidding?![]()
You jumped on it 2 seconds after I posted it...do you really think it had time to be determined as a joke?
How was that a joke? Did anyone else think he was kidding?![]()
You jumped on it 2 seconds after I posted it...do you really think it had time to be determined as a joke?
What? Stop being a moron and just admit you were mistaken and stop trying to hide your embarrassment by pretending you were only kidding. You aren't fooling anyone.
Um no? Obama did win concisely but it was not a blowout by any means.
Obama v. McCain: 365 to 173 (53% to 46% popular vote).
Your post is laughably wrong and I find it amusing how you chose to believe what you want to believe instead of spending half a second to check Wikipedia.
The California gubernatorial field was pretty wild...
This current crop of GOP hopefuls reminds me of California's "Parade O' Shame".
Now they just need a porn star to join the field...
Dems couldn't seem to manage to find a candidate to beat GWB in both 2000 and 2004.. pretty pathetic if you ask me.
Nixon v McGovern: 520 to 17
Reagen v Carter: 489 to 49
Reagan v. Mondale: 525 to 13
Bush v. Dukakis: 426 to 111
a better example of a terrible cantidate would be Al Gore, who despite a hugely popular president leaving the nomination to him, managed to screw it up and hand the presidency to a less popular president's son.
The funny thing is that even the relatively weak slate of candidates is comprised of far better candidates than obummer.
I'm not exactly old enough to remember these, but from what i remember of AP Gov class, these elections seem more to point to the fact that Reagan and Nixon in their times were enormously popular, and in the case of bush, that popularity trickled down to elect Bush.
a better example of a terrible cantidate would be Al Gore, who despite a hugely popular president leaving the nomination to him, managed to screw it up and hand the presidency to a less popular president's son.
I thought Howard Dean could have taken GW out, but Fox News submarined him so that the Dems would put forward John Kerry. John Kerry was probably the worst candidate I have seen in my lifetime, the only thing he inspires anyone to do is gouge their brain with a screwdriver when he talks.
We have had the worst possible choices for president for some time now. This year will be no different and yes Craig, I am talking about both parties.
Hell, I think the Repubs secretly love Obama because he is really really like them and they won't really mind losing this one.
The 'centrist fallacy', 'both sides are just as bad'. Obama is much 'less bad' than them.
We have had the worst possible choices for president for some time now. This year will be no different and yes Craig, I am talking about both parties.
Hell, I think the Repubs secretly love Obama because he is really really like them and they won't really mind losing this one.
Yep, that seems to be the shape of things right now. Neither side has a real leader in the race. The country is so divided I expect no real governing for the foreseeable future.
Your point is well taken. If President Obama is re-elected (as seems likely given the comedy of errors happening on the GOP side), he will be a lame duck and I fear the Tea Party element will take all available action to nullify his office's authority from the very start. We shall see . . .
Your point is well taken. If President Obama is re-elected (as seems likely given the comedy of errors happening on the GOP side), he will be a lame duck and I fear the Tea Party element will take all available action to nullify his office's authority from the very start. We shall see . . .
First part correct. Second part would be correct if it said "...than some of them."
