When has a party had a worse set of presidential primary candidates than Rep 2012?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

QuantumPion

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2005
6,010
1
76
You jumped on it 2 seconds after I posted it...do you really think it had time to be determined as a joke?

What? Stop being a moron and just admit you were mistaken and stop trying to hide your embarrassment by pretending you were only kidding. You aren't fooling anyone.
 

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
What? Stop being a moron and just admit you were mistaken and stop trying to hide your embarrassment by pretending you were only kidding. You aren't fooling anyone.

Hide my embarrassment from a douchebag like yourself? LMFAO
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
The California gubernatorial field was pretty wild...

Compared to some of you elderly folk, I'm rather young. All I know about presidency is bush clinton clinton bush bush obama...

We've gotten to a point where the field is so crappy that even presidents who aren't doing so hot can win reelection.
 

airdata

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2010
4,987
0
0
Um no? Obama did win concisely but it was not a blowout by any means.
Obama v. McCain: 365 to 173 (53% to 46% popular vote).

Your post is laughably wrong and I find it amusing how you chose to believe what you want to believe instead of spending half a second to check Wikipedia.

I know a republican didn't just bring up popular vote...
 

etrigan420

Golden Member
Oct 30, 2007
1,723
1
71
The California gubernatorial field was pretty wild...

Oooo, good call.

This current crop of GOP hopefuls reminds me of California's "Parade O' Shame".

Now they just need a porn star to join the field...
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
This current crop of GOP hopefuls reminds me of California's "Parade O' Shame".

Now they just need a porn star to join the field...

Creepy-Cain.jpg
 

HendrixFan

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2001
4,646
0
71
Dems couldn't seem to manage to find a candidate to beat GWB in both 2000 and 2004.. pretty pathetic if you ask me.

I thought Howard Dean could have taken GW out, but Fox News submarined him so that the Dems would put forward John Kerry. John Kerry was probably the worst candidate I have seen in my lifetime, the only thing he inspires anyone to do is gouge their brain with a screwdriver when he talks.
 

Fayd

Diamond Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,970
2
76
www.manwhoring.com
Nixon v McGovern: 520 to 17
Reagen v Carter: 489 to 49
Reagan v. Mondale: 525 to 13
Bush v. Dukakis: 426 to 111

I'm not exactly old enough to remember these, but from what i remember of AP Gov class, these elections seem more to point to the fact that Reagan and Nixon in their times were enormously popular, and in the case of bush, that popularity trickled down to elect Bush.

a better example of a terrible cantidate would be Al Gore, who despite a hugely popular president leaving the nomination to him, managed to screw it up and hand the presidency to a less popular president's son.

my point is that electoral vote counts aren't everything that determines an electable candidate.
 

HendrixFan

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2001
4,646
0
71
a better example of a terrible cantidate would be Al Gore, who despite a hugely popular president leaving the nomination to him, managed to screw it up and hand the presidency to a less popular president's son.

Policy wise, Gore would have done a good job as President as he would have put the surplus in a lockbox and work towards paying down the debt. Things would be quite different right now if he had "won". As a candidate he made a HUGE error in trying to distance himself from Clinton because of the Lewinsky scandal. He refused to let Clinton campaign for him and spoke in platitudes about how he was "his own man". The people wanted Clinton 2.0 and Gore wouldn't give it to them.
 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0
The funny thing is that even the relatively weak slate of candidates is comprised of far better candidates than obummer.

Well said!

It is really entertaining reading all the say it ain't so posts in this thread.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
As others have pointed out, the class of 1988 Democrats wasn't exactly top-notch either. Back then as today the field suffered from the lack of the obvious candidate to run and likely win - Mario Cuomo in 1988, Jeb Bush today. Jeb is probably still leery of running after Dubya kinda polluted the Bush name in the minds of voters, and who knows why Cuomo passed.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
I'm not exactly old enough to remember these, but from what i remember of AP Gov class, these elections seem more to point to the fact that Reagan and Nixon in their times were enormously popular, and in the case of bush, that popularity trickled down to elect Bush.

That's not exactly correct. Despite overwhelming electoral wins, their approval ratings were not as high as you'd expect from them.

It was less their being popular than successfully attacking the opponent in the election.

a better example of a terrible cantidate would be Al Gore, who despite a hugely popular president leaving the nomination to him, managed to screw it up and hand the presidency to a less popular president's son.

You blame Gore for the election being stolen - asinine.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
I thought Howard Dean could have taken GW out, but Fox News submarined him so that the Dems would put forward John Kerry. John Kerry was probably the worst candidate I have seen in my lifetime, the only thing he inspires anyone to do is gouge their brain with a screwdriver when he talks.

I don't think Fox gets all the blame - cable media more broadly and voters and I don't know what all, it's not really clear why that yell killed his candidacy, sadly for the country.
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
We have had the worst possible choices for president for some time now. This year will be no different and yes Craig, I am talking about both parties.

Hell, I think the Repubs secretly love Obama because he is really really like them and they won't really mind losing this one.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
We have had the worst possible choices for president for some time now. This year will be no different and yes Craig, I am talking about both parties.

Hell, I think the Repubs secretly love Obama because he is really really like them and they won't really mind losing this one.

The 'centrist fallacy', 'both sides are just as bad'. Obama is much 'less bad' than them.
 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0
We have had the worst possible choices for president for some time now. This year will be no different and yes Craig, I am talking about both parties.

Hell, I think the Repubs secretly love Obama because he is really really like them and they won't really mind losing this one.

Yep, that seems to be the shape of things right now. Neither side has a real leader in the race. The country is so divided I expect no real governing for the foreseeable future.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
66
91
Yep, that seems to be the shape of things right now. Neither side has a real leader in the race. The country is so divided I expect no real governing for the foreseeable future.

Your point is well taken. If President Obama is re-elected (as seems likely given the comedy of errors happening on the GOP side), he will be a lame duck and I fear the Tea Party element will take all available action to nullify his office's authority from the very start. We shall see . . .
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,600
4,698
136
Your point is well taken. If President Obama is re-elected (as seems likely given the comedy of errors happening on the GOP side), he will be a lame duck and I fear the Tea Party element will take all available action to nullify his office's authority from the very start. We shall see . . .


Perhaps, but being a lame duck has not always been a bad thing. Maybe Obama will completely drop any pretense of reaching out to the loons.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
349
126
Your point is well taken. If President Obama is re-elected (as seems likely given the comedy of errors happening on the GOP side), he will be a lame duck and I fear the Tea Party element will take all available action to nullify his office's authority from the very start. We shall see . . .

On the one hand, second terms usually don't go well.

I think this could be different though - Obama unplugged.

He's been so obstructed his first term, and has learned some lessons Ron Suskind just wrote about, such that I think he MIGHT get better.

Alternatively, we could learn the 'George Bush lesson' yet again. "oops."