When do you think Obama's admin will have boots on the ground in Iran/China/Russia?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
A

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
I think it will be when the Ahmadinejahd leaves office. When do you think it will be?

Obama won't strike Iran right now for three reasons I think:

he likes to see Netanyahu pissed and to use the situation to his advantage.

the next leader of Iran will be a true Persian (not a "global citizen" like Obama is) who won't be as smart as Ahmadinjahd is.

the debt/currency/trade war against China needs a definite turning point, and America isn't quite there... yet.

After the Hot War comes to a truce, I personally think Russia will become a confederation and that Rand Paul will be the first Constitutional Monarch of a fully unified American State. China will become the next superpower, but part of the treaty will be that they not attack America in return for the expendables, as of which I may be one... I hope I will not be expendable, because I wouldn't mind for Rand Paul to be a monarch because at least the warfare state would be gone and there would be some order (at least for a time)... he'll succeed where Washington failed.
 
EagleKeeper

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
I think you are full of it.

The US knows there is no need for boots on the ground in Iran.

What is a reason to go after Russia or China?

The money issue is not a reason to go to war as long as we continue to make payments.
If we do not make payments it should be China that is pissed.

As for Russia, you did not stated anything of value let alone a reason.
 
Matt1970

Matt1970

Lifer
Mar 19, 2007
12,320
3
0
300px-Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg
 
dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,277
32,848
136
The Obama Admin. does not want boots on the ground in any of those places, so yeah, never.
 
Jaskalas

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,655
9,955
136
Russia and China? No one's ever going to do that. You should question your own judgement for even mentioning it.

Iran? I don't think they will, as basic Democrat philosophy invites nuclear proliferation. Most of them just don't believe in the cost of war to stop something like that. Especially with Afghanistan and Iraq fresh in our minds. Our previous failures have only demonstrated the cost is much too high.

As one of the more extreme hawks on this board, even I would have trouble green lighting an Iran invasion after what I've learned of our competence over the past decade. We don't have the leadership to do what it takes in war.
 
Kadarin

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
War with China/Russia/Iran? Please... Obama is already going to have his hands full dealing with these racist fools who keep posting on Facebook that they need to "take America back" and secede from the Union because Obama is "destroying this country" or something.
 
waggy

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
OP are you ignorant of history and the world?

boots in russia or china? lol /facepalm
 
Hayabusa Rider

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
How does one place one's boots on the ground if dead? China and Russia will nuke us first.
 
Doppel

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
Obama will have US troops inside Moscow by end of 2013, I'm positive. He'll start by launching nukes at Russia, at least 30 of them and then mopping up with US troops.

Why? VODKA.
 
A

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
waggy said:
boots in russia or china? lol /facepalm
Click to expand...
Well, perhaps boots on the ground won't be necessary for the U.S. statists to get after China (Russia is too big and too geographically diverse, I'll admit that), but that leaves one of many questions... what are things the the U.S. govt could do to contribute to its destruction beyond what it is doing now?
 
Hayabusa Rider

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Anarchist420 said:
Well, perhaps boots on the ground won't be necessary for the U.S. statists to get after China (Russia is too big and too geographically diverse, I'll admit that), but that leaves one of many questions... what are things the the U.S. govt could do to contribute to its destruction beyond what it is doing now?
Click to expand...

You seem to be missing the important thing so I'll simplify it. You come towards my home with the intent of doing harm. I pull out a grenade and blow you to bits. How do you "put boots on the ground" when you have no feet?
 
Doppel

Doppel

Lifer
Feb 5, 2011
13,306
3
0
Hayabusa Rider said:
You seem to be missing the important thing so I'll simplify it. You come towards my home with the intent of doing harm. I pull out a grenade and blow you to bits. How do you "put boots on the ground" when you have no feet?
Click to expand...
but Russians are HUGE pussies!
 
A

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
Hayabusa Rider said:
You seem to be missing the important thing so I'll simplify it. You come towards my home with the intent of doing harm. I pull out a grenade and blow you to bits. How do you "put boots on the ground" when you have no feet?
Click to expand...
I couldn't, but you are missing the fact that Americans citizens are going to die to because of the U.S. govt. Besides, original meaning is of right and ought to be more important than intentions. If people went by original meaning, I'd be dead and there would be more confederalism in the world... that would be good.

Anyway, I don't think Russia will be a super power again, because after the war they'll turn on China and/or china will turn on them.
 
dank69

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,277
32,848
136
Anarchist420 said:
I couldn't, but you are missing the fact that Americans citizens are going to die to because of the U.S. govt. Besides, original meaning is of right and ought to be more important than intentions. If people went by original meaning, I'd be dead and there would be more confederalism in the world... that would be good.

Anyway, I don't think Russia will be a super power again, because after the war they'll turn on China and/or china will turn on them.
Click to expand...
You seem to be starting with the premise that there HAS to be a war soon. What do you think will happen if there isn't a war soon?
 
A

Anarchist420

Diamond Member
Feb 13, 2010
8,645
0
76
www.facebook.com
dank69 said:
What do you think will happen if there isn't a war soon?
Click to expand...
There already is a war (protectionism, sanctions, spying), so it must intensify or result in civil war at home. If there is a truce called between the U.S and China/Russia/Iran, then do you expect Congress to authorize the sale of U.S. govt land to pay off the U.S. govt's creditors?

There can't be a treaty between the welfare statists and the warfare statists... libertarians, myself included, will have to stay out of the crossfire so we can enjoy a good future.
 
Siddhartha

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
The OP is part of the apocalyptic paranoid fantasies that the No-Obama crowd have developed. Actually Obama invading Russia, China, and or Iran to kill US citizens is new to me. Usually the paranoia delusions go like, Obama is going to sell the US out to the UN, Islamist, Commies, Socialists, etc.
 
S

Screech

Golden Member
Oct 20, 2004
1,203
7
81
Guys,

There is no way someone would have grammar and spelling that is as good as A420's while being as retarded as A420 is trying to sound. If he/she/it was really stupid enough to believe the crap he/she/it posts, he/she/it would have retarded sounding posts, ie, they would sound more like incorruptible. Y'all are just getting trolled hardcore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom