Originally posted by: zephyrprime
What kind of performance can we expect? A big jump or a little one?
Originally posted by: natty1
so October then? is this all the info we have?
Originally posted by: natty1
so October then? is this all the info we have?
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Originally posted by: natty1
so October then? is this all the info we have?
All depends on TSMC, UMC, Global Foundries. Basically, TSMC is having 40nm issues and Nvidia uses them for 90% of their product supply. UMC gets 10% AFAIK.
ATI may have to resort to using GF is TSMC cannot get a move on. Who knows at this point.
Originally posted by: ZimZum
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Originally posted by: natty1
so October then? is this all the info we have?
All depends on TSMC, UMC, Global Foundries. Basically, TSMC is having 40nm issues and Nvidia uses them for 90% of their product supply. UMC gets 10% AFAIK.
ATI may have to resort to using GF is TSMC cannot get a move on. Who knows at this point.
One would think with ATI's ties with AMD came with the added benefit of having access to AMD's foundries . But from what I understand ATI never stopped using TSMC. I never understood that.
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
Originally posted by: ZimZum
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Originally posted by: natty1
so October then? is this all the info we have?
All depends on TSMC, UMC, Global Foundries. Basically, TSMC is having 40nm issues and Nvidia uses them for 90% of their product supply. UMC gets 10% AFAIK.
ATI may have to resort to using GF is TSMC cannot get a move on. Who knows at this point.
One would think with ATI's ties with AMD came with the added benefit of having access to AMD's foundries . But from what I understand ATI never stopped using TSMC. I never understood that.
I'm pretty sure AMD stopped manufacturing their own chips..
Originally posted by: ZimZum
Originally posted by: Scholzpdx
Originally posted by: ZimZum
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Originally posted by: natty1
so October then? is this all the info we have?
All depends on TSMC, UMC, Global Foundries. Basically, TSMC is having 40nm issues and Nvidia uses them for 90% of their product supply. UMC gets 10% AFAIK.
ATI may have to resort to using GF is TSMC cannot get a move on. Who knows at this point.
One would think with ATI's ties with AMD came with the added benefit of having access to AMD's foundries . But from what I understand ATI never stopped using TSMC. I never understood that.
I'm pretty sure AMD stopped manufacturing their own chips..
Yeah but thats a recent development. After the merger with ATI there was a 2+ year period before AMD spun off their foundries and ATI was in house. It doesnt seem like ATI utilized AMD's fabs at all in that period, which is puzzling.
Originally posted by: FalseChristian
As they go to smaller and smaller processes they are going to have more and more problems. Carbon (Graphene) chips are the answer. Silicon will be gone soon.![]()
Originally posted by: EnzoLT
Originally posted by: FalseChristian
As they go to smaller and smaller processes they are going to have more and more problems. Carbon (Graphene) chips are the answer. Silicon will be gone soon.![]()
thats so true. its funny though how colleges (well mine at least) wont get into the more advanced materials like graphene. still teaching the old 130nm silicon, lol