http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/when-68-means-100/
Anyway, I don't why anyone wants the Neo-Republican Party to take more power given that they have raised tax, fine, and fee revenues (while neither selling public weapons nor selling public land nor cancelling any debt) to all time highs rivaled only by when they controlled the South during re-destruction.
The Democrat Party isn't good either, but at least they haven't spent as much as the Neo-Republicans would've under Obama's presidential challengers.
Obama's Admin hasn't collected as much as the last Admin did in its first 6 years.
Obama hasn't raised the min wage but he will if the Neo-Republicans agree to it like they did when they last controlled the white house.
The GOP refused to extend the payroll tax cut because they want senior's votes and because Congress loves to be generous with everyone else's money.
unlike bush, Obama didn't shit on Bin Laden's family.
Obama hasn't enacted new gun control measures like bush advocated for.
Obama supported decentralized marriage law; bush favored a national centralist marriage law.
Obama isn't a hardcore nationalist out for his own security like Neo-Republicans usually are for themselves.
Obama didn't sign legislation to go after swiss bank accounts.
Obama didn't go against Ariel Sharon's advice about Iraq like Bush did.
Obama goes against Bibi because Bibi is commanding and the latter really can't minimize risk to his people. He can't let go of the U.S.G. in the best long-term interests of his people when Obama has offered him an exit from attachment to the Imperial World Govt.
Bush and the congressional GOP was more pro-abortion than Bill Clinton. The sum in $ of federal expenditures under the Clinton Admin wasnt much more if any more at all than 1/2 of Bush's Admin. Bush's admin, the Fed, and the Congressional GOP also increased absolute dollar amounts of tax revenue.
I'll never comprehend why anyone wants to go back to the policies of undivided and more powerful govt. The more the Neo-Republicans argue against one born free, the more liberty there is.
just why? why are the Neo-Republicans so popular? How could so many want higher taxes, more militaristic checkpoints, and more cops and more bureaucrats rather than independent charity and more liberty?
I imagine that those who want more warfare, more rape by cops, more govt revenue, more inflation, more debt, more illnesses from pharmaceutical me-too shit, more gun grabbing by the State and the Elite, and more spending on bureaucracy, murdering innocent people, and welfare as well increased min wage, worse medical care, more management dominance and traditional CEOs' dependence on their workers and the State will get it all under Mitt Romney or whoever the next Neo-Republican President of the United States is (unless it's Newt). As for myself, I am hoping i'll be dead and 100% of my remains cremated before Obama's leaves office.
Anyway, I don't why anyone wants the Neo-Republican Party to take more power given that they have raised tax, fine, and fee revenues (while neither selling public weapons nor selling public land nor cancelling any debt) to all time highs rivaled only by when they controlled the South during re-destruction.
The Democrat Party isn't good either, but at least they haven't spent as much as the Neo-Republicans would've under Obama's presidential challengers.
Obama's Admin hasn't collected as much as the last Admin did in its first 6 years.
Obama hasn't raised the min wage but he will if the Neo-Republicans agree to it like they did when they last controlled the white house.
The GOP refused to extend the payroll tax cut because they want senior's votes and because Congress loves to be generous with everyone else's money.
unlike bush, Obama didn't shit on Bin Laden's family.
Obama hasn't enacted new gun control measures like bush advocated for.
Obama supported decentralized marriage law; bush favored a national centralist marriage law.
Obama isn't a hardcore nationalist out for his own security like Neo-Republicans usually are for themselves.
Obama didn't sign legislation to go after swiss bank accounts.
Obama didn't go against Ariel Sharon's advice about Iraq like Bush did.
Obama goes against Bibi because Bibi is commanding and the latter really can't minimize risk to his people. He can't let go of the U.S.G. in the best long-term interests of his people when Obama has offered him an exit from attachment to the Imperial World Govt.
Bush and the congressional GOP was more pro-abortion than Bill Clinton. The sum in $ of federal expenditures under the Clinton Admin wasnt much more if any more at all than 1/2 of Bush's Admin. Bush's admin, the Fed, and the Congressional GOP also increased absolute dollar amounts of tax revenue.
I'll never comprehend why anyone wants to go back to the policies of undivided and more powerful govt. The more the Neo-Republicans argue against one born free, the more liberty there is.
just why? why are the Neo-Republicans so popular? How could so many want higher taxes, more militaristic checkpoints, and more cops and more bureaucrats rather than independent charity and more liberty?
I imagine that those who want more warfare, more rape by cops, more govt revenue, more inflation, more debt, more illnesses from pharmaceutical me-too shit, more gun grabbing by the State and the Elite, and more spending on bureaucracy, murdering innocent people, and welfare as well increased min wage, worse medical care, more management dominance and traditional CEOs' dependence on their workers and the State will get it all under Mitt Romney or whoever the next Neo-Republican President of the United States is (unless it's Newt). As for myself, I am hoping i'll be dead and 100% of my remains cremated before Obama's leaves office.
Facebook
Twitter