• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Whats with these SSD benchmark softwares?

HURRIC4NE

HURRIC4NE

Member
I used ATTO and then i also used CrystalDiskMark to benchmark my SSD on a new Z87 motherboard that i brought

ATTO posted speeds above 500mbps for the ssd but CrystalDiskMark surprisingly said i had a 214 seq read and 135 seq write. is the software wrong? i got a nice smile with the ATTO results while a sad face with the other software.

i checked all drivers (updated) made sure of bios settings, and even made sure it had the best port and the wire was not bent as much. but i still got the same results!
 
Let me guess Corsair Force 3 SSD in sig? Those results are about right for a sandforce ssd using asynchronous NAND.

The performance difference is due to ATTO using completely compressible data and CrystalDiskMark using incompressible data. (You can set CrystalDiskMark to use 0-fill or 1-fill and the results will be similar to ATTO)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top