Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: Corbett
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Neither Bush nor neoconservatism are 'conservative' in the least, so you're question is highly flawed.
Except I never said neoconservativism did I?
Back on subject. This is what liberals do. They try to rewrite history to say that everything was because of "conservative values" and that is why they are evil. The fact is, liberalism is what is taking this country down the tubes. ie - partial birth abortion/regular abortion, affirmative action (which actually hurts minorities), socialist agendas and so on. LIberals always try to compare issues of the past to issues of today as if slavery has the same connotations as anti-gay marriage, which is just not true. The same is true for most other arguments from the left as well.
No, you just really don't get it, and that's the problem:
There's little if any hatred of true conservatism, but plenty of well-earned hatred for neoconservatism. Since the two concepts are highly disconnected, you need not be offended by hatred for neoconservatism. When you equate anti-Republican sentiment with anti-conservative sentiment, you are severely misjudging the situation.
As far as your anti-Liberal rant there, I've never heard slavery used as an analogue for gay marriage, though I have heard inter-racial marriage used. I believe that's referred to as a straw-man