Originally posted by: wchou
Originally posted by: toattett
Originally posted by: wchou
Isn't that a waste of time? so annoying, I didn't buy dvd writer so I can write cd. It is only for backward compatibility. I hate it when reviews compare dvd writer by their cd performance writing and reading. Everytime I have to scroll through all the way to the bottom to look at dvd writing/reading test
http://www.cdrlabs.com/reviews/index.php?reviewid=262&page=Performance
You should add this too:
Isn't that a waste of time? so annoying, I didn't go to the computer store to buy CD-R but more expensive DVD+R. DVD+R will give the store more profit. I hate it when stores stack theirs DVD+Rs in the back and CD-Rs in front of them. Everytime I have to walk all the way to the back of the store to get the DVD+Rs I want.
all the reviewers do this same crap to puff up the reviews and make things much more complicated. I still have a cd burner that I could careless if someone ran it over with a 18 wheel truck.
Why don't they just skip cd-r testing?
it's obsolete format that only few use today. Why would it matter if 40x is a little slower then 48x? It's like comparing apples to oranges from dvdrw to dvdrw and becomes a moot point
All of them reviewers who are paid compares cd-r, rw... I think all of the dvdwriters do very well on cd burning so that is why I don't think it is needed. I had a dvd writer 8x opotorite that stop recognizing dvd's so it can read/write only cds, so it went in the trashcan as it was out of warranty anyways as its over 1 years old.