What's up with this OGG standard? Is it better than WMA or MP3??

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
48
91
I've never even heard of this until recently. What is it and how is it good?
 

StageLeft

No Lifer
Sep 29, 2000
70,150
5
0
It's funny. Everyonce in a while a new "better than MP3" format comes out and dies ;)
 

zCypher

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2002
6,115
171
116
It's been around for quite a while. Supposed to be better, yes. Widespread? No, not yet. Came around and died out? Nope...

I do have the plugin or whatever it was for it, so I can play OGG files if I ever need to. You can't make OGG CDs with nero though, so it's still not quite so good. ;)
 

clicknext

Banned
Mar 27, 2002
3,884
0
0
Thing about it is that MP3 has established itself as the standard, accepted and used by everyone. Someone can distribute an MP3 and everyone will be able to play it. The same certainly cannot be said about OGG. It's even harder to get something to be popular than to make something good.
 

Mallow

Diamond Member
Jul 25, 2001
6,108
1
0
buch came out at one point by microsoft and some other companies with copy right protection so they never caught on. It would be hard for anything to dethrone mp3z in accessibility.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,544
4,224
136
The most notable thing about OGG is that it's a patent-free, royalty-free, open technology. No onerous licensing, no DRM.

For example, it's used in Unreal Tournament 2K3 for the sound engine.
 

KokomoGST

Diamond Member
Nov 13, 2001
3,758
0
0
Also, people have been using it in videos especially for those tight squeezes onto a single CD.
There's less overhead than VBR MP3. But like others have said, MP3 is way more popular and more supported. But Ogg is just as good... it's variable bitrate by default? I personally don't use it for more than video editing and creation.
 
Jan 31, 2002
40,819
2
0
You only heard of OGG now, NFS4? :Q Figured you'd have heard of it.

It's been hanging around for quite awhile now in the open-source community. Lovely codec. Too bad more people don't know "What the hell's this egg file?" "Shut up and add it to the Winamp playlist, ya monkey."

Yes, it's used in games a fair bit for the aforementioned reasons (low-overhead VBR, excellent compression and size/quality ratio) including Serious Sam and UT2003.

- M4H
 

coolVariable

Diamond Member
May 18, 2001
3,724
0
76
And VHS wasn't the best either (Beta Max was far superior, but only Sony supported it and wanted it all for themselves so it did not succeed)
 

Supermercado

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2002
5,893
0
76
Ogg is open-source, like has been said. I believe that the encoding algorithm is slightly better than that of mp3 and the file sizes are smaller for equivalent-quality mp3s. My friend has a really good ear and he uses only --aps vbr mp3s or oggs, and sometimes mpcs. He's been ripping CDs in Ogg lately, though, I think.
 

pulse8

Lifer
May 3, 2000
20,860
1
81
Originally posted by: coolVariable
And VHS wasn't the best either (Beta Max was far superior, but only Sony supported it and wanted it all for themselves so it did not succeed)

Which is exactly my point. Thank you for pointing it out to the rest of the forum. :p
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
in theory its supposed to be a little bit better.

monkey's audio > all
 

Akki

Member
Nov 27, 2002
139
0
0
Ogg is open, and supports a lot more advanced stuff than wma/mp3 such as multi-channel audio. It'd be nice if everyone used ogg, but it's not going to happen.

You can't compare Monkey's Audio to ogg/mp3/whatever... lossless vs lossy, apples and oranges :)

 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
Originally posted by: Akki

You can't compare Monkey's Audio to ogg/mp3/whatever... lossless vs lossy, apples and oranges :)
i think i just did ;)

 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,368
1,879
126
ogg ... from my understanding ... the sound quality per MB of data is better due to more optimized compression. Of course 5 years ago VQF was better (MB/MB it did sound better, however it took 12 hours to encode a CD on a celeron 300@450 ... while the l3enc beta i had at that time would encode in only a few hours) and of course VQF is so popular today ... (bad sarcasm, sorry)