What's the point of posting "Unban Member X" in your sig?

[Evadman]

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire

Originally posted by: schizoid
I like poo.

Text

- M4H

Bwhahahahahahaha!

 

[shiner]

It's a form of protest against the double standard that got millenium banned.

 

[shiner]

Originally posted by: Broohaha
the real question is: why does anyone care that millenium was banned....?

See here

He was banned because of a BS double standard.

 

[Pepsi90919]

the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

 

[shiner]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

A. It has nothing to do with Democracy, it has to do with double standards.

B. Nobody wants a say in who is or isn't banned. What they want is a set of rules that will be followed fairly and not have judgments handed down on a whim.

C. If it weren't for the traffic these forums generate there wouldn't be any $ to pay the bills.

 

[nan0bug]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

people like you that think this is even remotely acceptable are:

a) a$$ kissing

b) wannabe mods

c) who don't realize that our traffic generates ad revenue that pays the bills.

 

[Broohaha]

god i could really use a pepsi right now.....

 

[Pepsi90919]

Originally posted by: shinerburke

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

A. It has nothing to do with Democracy, it has to do with double standards.

B. Nobody wants a say in who is or isn't banned. What they want is a set of rules that will be followed fairly and not have judgments handed down on a whim.

C. If it weren't for the traffic these forums generate there wouldn't be any $ to pay the bills.

A. which in turn has to do with democracy, since the kiddies think that since they're a member of this community they're like a stockholder and have say in what goes in the corporation. ATOT can have any kind of double standard they want.

B. the user in question had it coming for a long time anyway. this, i'm sure, pushed him over the edge.

C. i don't think ATOT helps anand's pocketbook any.

 

[Gyrene]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

You're an ass-kisser. No human being could possibly believe a word of the BS you're spouting off.

 

[Pepsi90919]

Originally posted by: nan0bug

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

people like you that think this is even remotely acceptable are:

a) a$$ kissing

b) wannabe mods

c) who don't realize that our traffic generates ad revenue that pays the bills.

go start your own damn forums if you want to run your own dictatorship.

 

[Pepsi90919]

Originally posted by: dtyn

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

You're an ass-kisser. No human being could possibly believe a word of the BS you're spouting off.

right, i'm kissing ass. go buy a dictionary.

 

[RossMAN]

Originally posted by: Broohaha
god i could really use a pepsi right now.....

Pepsi or Dr. Pepper with ice cubes, I could really go for one right now.

 

[Pepsi90919]

i don't drink pepsi anymore.

 

[Kadarin]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

No. It's about basic fairness, and a complaint against the largely arbitrary moderation here.

 

[Zim Hosein]

Originally posted by: Broohaha
god i could really use a pepsi right now.....

What you need is a :beer:

 

[Looney]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

LOL nicely said!

Really, if you're going to stand up on principle for something, there is much better time to waste your life on than ATOT.

 

[Ameesh]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

without the members of this board, this board would be stupid, if the members have legitmate complaints the mods should hear them, they are here to help make the boards run smoothly for us not push there own politcal or ideology on us when they please.

 

[shiner]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919

Originally posted by: shinerburke

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

A. It has nothing to do with Democracy, it has to do with double standards.

B. Nobody wants a say in who is or isn't banned. What they want is a set of rules that will be followed fairly and not have judgments handed down on a whim.

C. If it weren't for the traffic these forums generate there wouldn't be any $ to pay the bills.

A. which in turn has to do with democracy, since the kiddies think that since they're a member of this community they're like a stockholder and have say in what goes in the corporation. ATOT can have any kind of double standard they want.

B. the user in question had it coming for a long time anyway. this, i'm sure, pushed him over the edge.

C. i don't think ATOT helps anand's pocketbook any.

A. No, it's about having rules that are followed by all. Right now punishment is handed out at times for no reason or explanation. I've been banned a couple of times myself by one Mod only to have another email me a day or so later and tell me I was unbanned because what the Mod that banned me did was wrong. If this place continues to function without rules we will continue to lose some of our best and oldest members.

B. Maybe he had it coming, maybe he didn't. If he did then they should have banned him for whatever he did at that time. Banning someone for an act after the fact is not a good way to do things. Would you spank a child three days after they did something? Punishment should be handed out at the time of an offense, not after.


C. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

 

[Pepsi90919]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

No. It's about basic fairness, and a complaint against the largely arbitrary moderation here.

well at least your retort wasn't bitchy.

 

[shiner]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919

Originally posted by: nan0bug

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

people like you that think this is even remotely acceptable are:

a) a$$ kissing

b) wannabe mods

c) who don't realize that our traffic generates ad revenue that pays the bills.

go start your own damn forums if you want to run your own dictatorship.

Ummm....you were just the one saying that these forums are a dictatorship. You don't seem to have a problem with that, but when someone questions your motives you want to shut them down. Niiiiiiice....

 

[Pepsi90919]

Originally posted by: shinerburke

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919

Originally posted by: shinerburke

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

A. It has nothing to do with Democracy, it has to do with double standards.

B. Nobody wants a say in who is or isn't banned. What they want is a set of rules that will be followed fairly and not have judgments handed down on a whim.

C. If it weren't for the traffic these forums generate there wouldn't be any $ to pay the bills.

A. which in turn has to do with democracy, since the kiddies think that since they're a member of this community they're like a stockholder and have say in what goes in the corporation. ATOT can have any kind of double standard they want.

B. the user in question had it coming for a long time anyway. this, i'm sure, pushed him over the edge.

C. i don't think ATOT helps anand's pocketbook any.

A. No, it's about having rules that are followed by all. Right now punishment is handed out at times for no reason or explanation. I've been banned a couple of times myself by one Mod only to have another email me a day or so later and tell me I was unbanned because what the Mod that banned me did was wrong. If this place continues to function without rules we will continue to lose some of our best and oldest members.

B. Maybe he had it coming, maybe he didn't. If he did then they should have banned him for whatever he did at that time. Banning someone for an act after the fact is not a good way to do things. Would you spank a child three days after they did something? Punishment should be handed out at the time of an offense, not after.


C. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

A. i've been banned as well, but in a case such as this board where you have multiple moderators, each with different levels of edginess and trigger-happiness, i suppose a set of rules is a good idea.

B. whatever he did at the time wasn't enough to get him banned and this was.

C. exactly.

 

[schizoid]

I got in M4H's Sig!


HE LOVES ME! HE REALLY LOVES ME!

 

[Pepsi90919]

Originally posted by: shinerburke

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919

Originally posted by: nan0bug

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
the point is that the little peons get their rocks off by thinking that:

a) this board is somehow a democracy

b) they have any say in how said 'democracy' is run and can hold votes and elections and petitions and such

c) they must 'fight the power' ... even though the 'power' pays the bills.

people like you that think this is even remotely acceptable are:

a) a$$ kissing

b) wannabe mods

c) who don't realize that our traffic generates ad revenue that pays the bills.

go start your own damn forums if you want to run your own dictatorship.

Ummm....you were just the one saying that these forums are a dictatorship. You don't seem to have a problem with that, but when someone questions your motives you want to shut them down. Niiiiiiice....

no, i just don't like nanobug and didn't feel like devoting more than 5 seconds towards a comprehensible reply. if he feels confused or even somewhat vindicated by what i said, then more power to him. i don't care.

 

[SoylentGreen]

Internet DRAMA at it's finest.

 

[Gyrene]

Well, the case and point, the mods were complete assholes when they banned Millennium and not FelixDeKat. Either both should have been banned, or Millennium shouldn't have been banned. I'll probably get banned for calling them assholes, but I don't care, because they are being assholes, and they should know that.