AccruedExpenditure
Diamond Member
I don't get it, if a couple splits up, doesn't have any kids, why should one person have to pay remittance to the other?
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
Because that one person was stupid enough to support the other person for a given period of time. Anyone dumb enough to put themselves into a situation where they can get socked for alimony deserves it. I have a cousin who was ultra ignorant and got hit for child support and alimony FOR LIFE. The bytch will never remarry. It served him right for being blind, dumb and stupid.
Originally posted by: aRCeNiTe
I don't understand the difference between alimony and child support. I personally am a child of divorce (living with mom) and she receives child support & alimony. I don't get in the middle of it. I can understand child support, but I thought alimony was only if there was children too.. man, that's bullshit...
Bill
Originally posted by: HotChic
Scenario A:
Husband and wife are on similar career tracks making similar salaries. Husband gets the opportunity for promotion if he relocates. This will put her career a little off-track, she won't have the seniority in a new place to earn the promotions she would if they stay, but they talk it over and agree that this promotion brings in enough income that it's worth it.
They divorce. Now he's got the higher-paying job, has been promoted, and she's at the same level with fewer prospects of promotions. A decision they made as a couple to benefit them both suddenly screws her over when they divorce.
Just a hypothetical scenario where alimony seems reasonable. Not all divorce situations make alimony reasonable.
Originally posted by: HotChic
Scenario A:
Husband and wife are on similar career tracks making similar salaries. Husband gets the opportunity for promotion if he relocates. This will put her career a little off-track, she won't have the seniority in a new place to earn the promotions she would if they stay, but they talk it over and agree that this promotion brings in enough income that it's worth it.
They divorce. Now he's got the higher-paying job, has been promoted, and she's at the same level with fewer prospects of promotions. A decision they made as a couple to benefit them both suddenly screws her over when they divorce.
Just a hypothetical scenario where alimony seems reasonable. Not all divorce situations make alimony reasonable.
Originally posted by: rival
funny how the chick gets the $$ in your story...HMMM?
ive never heard of an instance where alimony actually made any sense
Originally posted by: HotChic
Scenario A:
Husband and wife are on similar career tracks making similar salaries. Husband gets the opportunity for promotion if he relocates. This will put her career a little off-track, she won't have the seniority in a new place to earn the promotions she would if they stay, but they talk it over and agree that this promotion brings in enough income that it's worth it.
They divorce. Now he's got the higher-paying job, has been promoted, and she's at the same level with fewer prospects of promotions. A decision they made as a couple to benefit them both suddenly screws her over when they divorce.
Just a hypothetical scenario where alimony seems reasonable. Not all divorce situations make alimony reasonable.
Originally posted by: HotChic
Scenario A:
Husband and wife are on similar career tracks making similar salaries. Husband gets the opportunity for promotion if he relocates. This will put her career a little off-track, she won't have the seniority in a new place to earn the promotions she would if they stay, but they talk it over and agree that this promotion brings in enough income that it's worth it.
They divorce. Now he's got the higher-paying job, has been promoted, and she's at the same level with fewer prospects of promotions. A decision they made as a couple to benefit them both suddenly screws her over when they divorce.
Just a hypothetical scenario where alimony seems reasonable. Not all divorce situations make alimony reasonable.
Originally posted by: HotChic
Scenario A: Husband and wife are on similar career tracks making similar salaries. Husband gets the opportunity for promotion if he relocates. This will put her career a little off-track, she won't have the seniority in a new place to earn the promotions she would if they stay, but they talk it over and agree that this promotion brings in enough income that it's worth it. They divorce. Now he's got the higher-paying job, has been promoted, and she's at the same level with fewer prospects of promotions. A decision they made as a couple to benefit them both suddenly screws her over when they divorce. Just a hypothetical scenario where alimony seems reasonable. Not all divorce situations make alimony reasonable.
This falls under the "life's a bitch, get a helmet" blanket.Originally posted by: HotChic
Scenario A:
Husband and wife are on similar career tracks making similar salaries. Husband gets the opportunity for promotion if he relocates. This will put her career a little off-track, she won't have the seniority in a new place to earn the promotions she would if they stay, but they talk it over and agree that this promotion brings in enough income that it's worth it.
They divorce. Now he's got the higher-paying job, has been promoted, and she's at the same level with fewer prospects of promotions. A decision they made as a couple to benefit them both suddenly screws her over when they divorce.
Just a hypothetical scenario where alimony seems reasonable. Not all divorce situations make alimony reasonable.
I would say that if she completely gave up a income producing career, then there is reason for TEMPORARY alimony.This is very reasonable, as well as someone who stays at home to raise kids instead of persuing their career.
However in these scenarios, I'm skeptical that a man would be able to collect alimony for life if he were the one making the career sacrifices.