actually the 9750 is a pretty slow cpu itself. I would hardly say it obliterates a 4800 X2 especially in apps that only use 2 cores. that is lot of stuff for just 210 bucks though.
Idk, I would say so. It's subjective but IMO its true.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/2489/12
Crysis CPU Benchmark:
AMD 6400+ 3.2ghz 2MB L2: 50.1fps
Phenom 9750 2.4ghz: 44.3fps
FX 4800+ 2.4ghz 2MB L2(
theorectical with 100% scaling): 37.72fps.
Now, this is with 800mhz ram. The FX X2 4800+ (and likely paired with 400mhz) is 2.4ghz, and since the cache is the same and the bus is the same, at best it should scale 100%. That would put the 4800+ at 37fps. The Phenom is 17% faster per clock, per core. Go further down and you can see the Phenom is trailing the much higher clocked (33%) dual core by only 7% in a CPU limited game.
I know these are just benchmarks, and CPU performance can (and will) vary on a case by case basis, but it's a 2.4ghz quad. It is fast enough for every game on the market to at least play well, while the 4800+ is awful with most new games. The Phenom will last him a lot longer. Especially considering he has been holding onto old s939 tech for so long.
For everyone to even think about an old 939 CPU is ridiculous. The 4800+ is going to cost him around $250-400, as the last time I went on a nostalgic run for 939 CPUs it was around that ballpark.
Cliffs: Buy newer.
Edit: Math FAIL! Corrected.
Also, I just read the conclusion to that article, man it's hilarious. Were almost done with 2010 and look at this.
xciting times are ahead as well. AMD seems very confident in its 45nm transition, which should bring about higher performance and clock frequencies. Around the same time we'll be seeing the very first Nehalem CPUs from Intel, and before we know it it'll be 2009 and time to talk about Bulldozer. I've always said that AMD had a good roadmap, it just needs to be given the chance to execute on it; these new Phenom processors may able to buy AMD the time it needs to do just that.
:whiste: