Whats the difference.......

[sorehead]

between the Celeron Tualatin and Celeron Coppermine processors?

 

[Jeff7181]

Originally posted by: sorehead
between the Celeron Tualatin and Celeron Coppermine processors?

Coppermine ones use copper rather than aluminum... I'm sure there's other differences, but that's the most obvious.

 

[ToxicWaste]

Tualatin has 512kb of L2 cache, Coppermine has 256kb of L2 cache. Ah crap, that's for Pentium's, not celerons. Celerons have half that much L2 cache, so the tualatin celeron would have 256kb of L2 cache and the coppermine celeron has 128kb of L2 cache.

 

[jjyiz28]

Originally posted by: Jeff7181

Originally posted by: sorehead
between the Celeron Tualatin and Celeron Coppermine processors?

Coppermine ones use copper rather than aluminum... I'm sure there's other differences, but that's the most obvious.

hahahah... i hope ur joking, there is NO copper in coppermines. it uses aluminum metal interconnects.

celly tualatin, 256KB L2 cache, .13 micron process, 133mhz bus
celly coppermind, 128KB L2 cache, .18, 100mhz bus.

 

[klah]

Originally posted by: jjyiz28

Originally posted by: Jeff7181

Originally posted by: sorehead
between the Celeron Tualatin and Celeron Coppermine processors?

Coppermine ones use copper rather than aluminum... I'm sure there's other differences, but that's the most obvious.

hahahah... i hope ur joking, there is NO copper in coppermines. it uses aluminum metal interconnects.
celly tualatin, 256KB L2 cache, .13 micron process, 133mhz bus
celly coppermind, 128KB L2 cache, .18, 100mhz bus.

Coppermine's below 800MHz have a 66MHz fsb.
Also, I think all Tualatin's had an IHS while only the later Coppermine's used one.