• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What's the difference between Clawhammer, Newcastle and Winchester?

ndee

Lifer
I swear, one day, I will make a webpage with all those names for CPUs, etc. With a nice trend curve where you can see, when which CPU gets obsolete. /rant

So, what's the big difference those? They Clawhammers are on sale so I think those are maybe the older CPUs?

Thanks for any info!
 
Winchester > ClawHammer > Newcaster.
NewCaste was initially developed for A64s, with the ClawHammers coming off the SledgeHammer S940 cores. Meaning that ClawHammers reign at the high end levels, (3800+, 4000+, FX-53, FX-55) All of the above are based on the 130nm proccess.
The newer Winchester core that everyone cares about starts off in the S939 series, in the 3000+, 3200+ and 3500+. It's based on the 90nm proccess and everyone loves overclocking them. 😉
 
Originally posted by: Kensai
Winchester > ClawHammer > Newcastle.
Newcastle was initially developed for A64s, with the ClawHammers coming off the SledgeHammer S940 cores. Meaning that ClawHammers reign at the high end levels, (3800+, 4000+, FX-53, FX-55) All of the above are based on the 130nm proccess.
The newer Winchester core that everyone cares about starts off in the S939 series, in the 3000+, 3200+ and 3500+. It's based on the 90nm proccess and everyone loves overclocking them. 😉

 
Back
Top