Why can't Linux figure out what a digital LCD is? Seems every distro I try to load doesn't know what a digital LCD is. I get a Linux BSOD with every distro at some point in the install process. If I switch to my analog cable then it's ok but I don't want to use analog. If Linux is looking to be better than Windows than it has to support hardware as good as or better than Windows. Digital LCDs are not new so I find it inexcusable that you are forced to go analog to load Linux. I'm sure Linux experts know how to fix the problem but I'm a noob and if Linux wants to covert guys from the Windows camp they've got to make it easier.
Also, I couldn't get Fedora Project to install. It would get to a point in the install process where it was loading the image to the HD and then I'd get an error message saying HD is probably full. I'm using a 12GB HD that is empty, no partitions, non formatted, nada. There is nothing on the HD and I'm giving it all to Linux so what's the deal? Fedora says it only needs 1.2 GB or something for what I'm trying to install and I'm letting it have all 12GB.
Also, I couldn't get Fedora Project to install. It would get to a point in the install process where it was loading the image to the HD and then I'd get an error message saying HD is probably full. I'm using a 12GB HD that is empty, no partitions, non formatted, nada. There is nothing on the HD and I'm giving it all to Linux so what's the deal? Fedora says it only needs 1.2 GB or something for what I'm trying to install and I'm letting it have all 12GB.