Whats the best 40GB drive for IDE RAID

sean2002

Golden Member
Apr 9, 2001
1,538
0
0
I'm looking to buy 2 40GB drives to use in a RAID 0 setup, which drives are best for this purpose? I heard the IBM 120GVP drive work good in a RAID array. I know of all the trouble people had with IBM HD's but I had 2 75GXP's and 1 60GXP and never failed me.
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
3
81
Originally posted by: sean2002
I'm looking to buy 2 40GB drives to use in a RAID 0 setup, which drives are best for this purpose? I heard the IBM 120GVP drive work good in a RAID array. I know of all the trouble people had with IBM HD's but I had 2 75GXP's and 1 60GXP and never failed me.


If you like to live dangeously, go for twin 120GXP 40's. :)
 

FrozenAthlon

Senior member
Jan 24, 2002
311
0
0
My vote goes for the IBM, I was talking with my tech bud at falcon Northwest the other day and went into a discussion about RAID. Following his advice in regards to the performance numbers given by 120GXP's, definately reconsider your options. IBM has done alot of research and developement to fix problems with the past issues regarding the 75 line of hard drives. Whenever you use RAID, your living dangerously to begin with, its a fantastic drive you'll be satisfied with :)

EDIT: spelling
 

jbond04

Senior member
Oct 18, 2000
505
0
71
John, I'm planning on buying two 40GB 120GXP's as well. For 40GB performance, IBM can't be beat. An FYI, I've never had a problem with my 30GB 75GXP. It's been running 24x7 for a year and a half now with nary a problem. :)
 

MrGrim

Golden Member
Oct 20, 1999
1,653
0
0
Originally posted by: jbond04
John, I'm planning on buying two 40GB 120GXP's as well. For 40GB performance, IBM can't be beat. An FYI, I've never had a problem with my 30GB 75GXP. It's been running 24x7 for a year and a half now with nary a problem. :)

Why is it in man's nature to completely ignore any signs of danger until something bad actually happens? Exactly how much faster is a 120GXP RAID 0 array to a Seagate Baracuda IV one? Why on earth would you be willing to take such a risk?

People amaze me.
 

VTrider

Golden Member
Nov 21, 1999
1,358
0
0
Ya know there are some serious RAID issues with some of the Seagate Barricuda IV drives right now. Seems that some of the Barricuda drives have lousy RAID performance. I guess (from reading earlier posts) that Seagate will swap these with RAID optimized drives free of charge. Do a search on it and you will see what i'm talking about.

-VTrider
 

Vette73

Lifer
Jul 5, 2000
21,503
9
0
Get a couple of Maxtor 740 series drives. They are ata133, 2mb, 7200rpm. Never had a problem with my maxtors. Had a friedn of mine say his moms computer had a bad maxtor so he gave it to me. I formated it and it will be going in my Linux Box :)
 

John

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
33,944
3
81
I use a pair of D740X "L's" in raid 0

HD Tach version 2.61
Drive: MAXTOR 6L060L3 A93.
Access time: 12.4ms
CPU utilization: 7.0%
1789 zones to be tested (65536kb zones)
Burst speed: 107504kps
Average read speed: 35188
 

Mem

Lifer
Apr 23, 2000
21,476
13
81
Another vote for Maxtor D740X,I`ve never had any problems with mine,good price & good performance.


:)
 

Lucky

Lifer
Nov 26, 2000
13,126
1
0
why do you need RAID-0? What specific purposes are you hoping to improve performance for?
 

sean2002

Golden Member
Apr 9, 2001
1,538
0
0
Originally posted by: Lucky
why do you need RAID-0? What specific purposes are you hoping to improve performance for?

Now that I have done some reading on RAID 0, I'll think I'll pass and just stick with my current WD 1200JB

 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Maxtor's D740X (which has the speediest seek times available for IDE) is the perfect choice for RAID0.

BUT...

I would seriously reconsider an IDE RAID0 setup, however. IDE is not the proper subsystem for a RAID configuration. You don't get true hardware RAID (unless you're looking to drop $250-300 minimum for a hardware IDE RAID controller), the drives simply aren't built to handle the demands of RAID. They tend to fail much easier and quicker. SCSI is the only choice for RAID, both from a performance as well as reliability aspect.
 

Lucky

Lifer
Nov 26, 2000
13,126
1
0
Originally posted by: sean2002
Originally posted by: Lucky
why do you need RAID-0? What specific purposes are you hoping to improve performance for?

Now that I have done some reading on RAID 0, I'll think I'll pass and just stick with my current WD 1200JB




Good choice. :D