DrPizza
Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Originally posted by
the .125 equation is good, however i agree that it limits the spread in older situations. If you increase it to 2 then it works out much better. Just my own opinion.
See what I mean about the math? I'm wondering how
can possibly evaluate to "2" Well... I know how it's possible: if one person is 10 and the other is negative 10 years old...(age of older person - age of younger person) / age of older person <= 0.125
.2 does sound a little better... like the maximum cut-off allowable.