- Mar 12, 2000
- 1,187
- 0
- 0
Well folks this is my first time posting in this particular forum and I must say that this is not a pleasure call.
Ok here is my complaint: In the last several weeks there have been many HIGHLY HEATED discussions regarding P4 vs. T-bird threads. These threads haven't been necessarily constructive but entertaining none the less. From all of this there has been one thing in particular that really bothers me it would deal with a certain person being banned for a week we will now call this person Mr. X for the remainder of this discussion.
This banning comes about from Mr. X getting his name and address posted on the forum in a particular thread and outwardly threatened to get his A$$ KICKED. After emailing a moderator to let them know what had been done and calling the person that posted his name a few choice words he got the short banning. Now I am not disagreeing with the banning of Mr.X for use of profanity I am however disagreeing with the NON-BANNING of the person who posted his name, address, and the threat.
Now mind you the person that posted Mr. X's name and address had to look it up on the internet. So he did it to purposely provoke Mr. X into the tyraid that produced the profanity. I think that this whole thing is wrong and I beleive that the person who did the posting should have gotten BANNED at least as long as Mr. X if not for eternity.
The following are some of the rules and regulations that have been adopted by Anandtech these rules and regulations are SUPPOSED to be up held by the MODERATORS. I would assume that the MODERATORS are to uphold these RULES AND REGULATIONS WITHOUT FAVORITISM OR PREJUDICE:
<< You agree that you will not use our forums to post any material, or links to any material, which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, HARRASING, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, THREATENING, INVASIVE OF A PERSON'S PRIVACY, or otherwise violative of any law. >>
So I ask: Why is it that one person is banned and the other is allowed to go on his merry way as if he never did anything wrong??
Ok here is my complaint: In the last several weeks there have been many HIGHLY HEATED discussions regarding P4 vs. T-bird threads. These threads haven't been necessarily constructive but entertaining none the less. From all of this there has been one thing in particular that really bothers me it would deal with a certain person being banned for a week we will now call this person Mr. X for the remainder of this discussion.
This banning comes about from Mr. X getting his name and address posted on the forum in a particular thread and outwardly threatened to get his A$$ KICKED. After emailing a moderator to let them know what had been done and calling the person that posted his name a few choice words he got the short banning. Now I am not disagreeing with the banning of Mr.X for use of profanity I am however disagreeing with the NON-BANNING of the person who posted his name, address, and the threat.
Now mind you the person that posted Mr. X's name and address had to look it up on the internet. So he did it to purposely provoke Mr. X into the tyraid that produced the profanity. I think that this whole thing is wrong and I beleive that the person who did the posting should have gotten BANNED at least as long as Mr. X if not for eternity.
The following are some of the rules and regulations that have been adopted by Anandtech these rules and regulations are SUPPOSED to be up held by the MODERATORS. I would assume that the MODERATORS are to uphold these RULES AND REGULATIONS WITHOUT FAVORITISM OR PREJUDICE:
<< You agree that you will not use our forums to post any material, or links to any material, which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, HARRASING, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, THREATENING, INVASIVE OF A PERSON'S PRIVACY, or otherwise violative of any law. >>
So I ask: Why is it that one person is banned and the other is allowed to go on his merry way as if he never did anything wrong??
