bamacre
Lifer
- Jul 1, 2004
- 21,029
- 2
- 61
Originally posted by: Evan
Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Evan
100% relevant, they're exactly the same thing. Dems thought Iraq would be fought a certain way, it wasn't, and now they're against it. Zero difference between that and Paul's excuses with Afghanistan.
Yeah, except for the fact that Iraq nor anyone in Iraq attacked us. You know, that whole thing.
WTF? Dems nor Repubs claimed Iraq attacked us.
Exactly. That's why Paul voted against invading Iraq. Not only that, but he spoke out against the invasion many times before we went in there.
Are you trying to imply Paul was wrong for voting for the invasion of Afghanistan, or wrong for not voting for the invasion of Iraq?
No, I'm not. I support the war in Afghanistan. I'm saying your excuse making is hypocritical considering Paul's stance.
My excuse? What are you talking about? Paul's stance is to get out of there at this point. We're doing nothing but nation building, OBL and al Zawahiri aren't even there anymore.