• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

whats a "crate" engine??

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: halik
Stock engine internals, upgraded fuel system/fuel mapping, bigger ( a lot bigger) turbos, huge FMIC and the obvious fuel pump/injectors. The crank/rods/pistons all stock. They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.

Your point is? By my (rough) calculations, you've got $8k in the engine after import tariffs and shipping, and another ~$20k in the upgrades unless you can DIY which I've never heard anyone who knows anything about turbos recommend to a newbie.

Or, for $8k you can get a HO 502 crate from GM Parts Direct. 500HP 510ft/lb direct from the crate, ready to run.
 
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: halik
Stock engine internals, upgraded fuel system/fuel mapping, bigger ( a lot bigger) turbos, huge FMIC and the obvious fuel pump/injectors. The crank/rods/pistons all stock. They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.

Your point is? By my (rough) calculations, you've got $8k in the engine after import tariffs and shipping, and another ~$20k in the upgrades unless you can DIY which I've never heard anyone who knows anything about turbos recommend to a newbie.

Or, for $8k you can get a HO 502 crate from GM Parts Direct. 500HP 510ft/lb direct from the crate, ready to run.

The Supra still handles alot better than an old musclecar with an axle and leaf springs in the back.
 
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: halik
Stock engine internals, upgraded fuel system/fuel mapping, bigger ( a lot bigger) turbos, huge FMIC and the obvious fuel pump/injectors. The crank/rods/pistons all stock. They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.

Your point is? By my (rough) calculations, you've got $8k in the engine after import tariffs and shipping, and another ~$20k in the upgrades unless you can DIY which I've never heard anyone who knows anything about turbos recommend to a newbie.

Or, for $8k you can get a HO 502 crate from GM Parts Direct. 500HP 510ft/lb direct from the crate, ready to run.

The Supra still handles alot better than an old musclecar with an axle and leaf springs in the back.

Hey cmon... you know its only about going fast in a straight line in this country... 😛
 
the engine form japan is about 5,
the donor body is about 2 grand, the set of nice big .7/.7 turbos maybe another 3. Add it 3 more grand for the fuel system upgrades and you have a crazy fast car for under 15 grand

That is assuming you do everything yourself thought

As far as your compression ratio goes, people usually dont keep the the same as the increase the boost, most of the the time they lean it out to get the most hp
 
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi
 
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: boyRacer

Hey cmon... you know its only about going fast in a straight line in this country... 😛

LOL, or go fast, turn left.....


:beer:

Yeah, cause the Viper was never a huge competitor in LeMans or anything...
And the Corvette C5R was never dominant either...
rolleye.gif
 
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: boyRacer

Hey cmon... you know its only about going fast in a straight line in this country... 😛

LOL, or go fast, turn left.....


:beer:

Yeah, cause the Viper was never a huge competitor in LeMans or anything...

My sarcastic comment was referred to this post...

The Supra still handles alot better than an old musclecar with an axle and leaf springs in the back.

I dont think the Viper has leaf springs... 😛
 
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: boyRacer

Hey cmon... you know its only about going fast in a straight line in this country... 😛

LOL, or go fast, turn left.....


:beer:

Yeah, cause the Viper was never a huge competitor in LeMans or anything...

My sarcastic comment was referred to this post...

The Supra still handles alot better than an old musclecar with an axle and leaf springs in the back.

I dont think the Viper has leaf springs... 😛

But the blanket statement (I know...made in sarcasm 😛) of saying "fast in US = straight" is a glaring innacuracy, just as long as you know that 😉
 
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: boyRacer
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: boyRacer

Hey cmon... you know its only about going fast in a straight line in this country... 😛

LOL, or go fast, turn left.....


:beer:

Yeah, cause the Viper was never a huge competitor in LeMans or anything...

My sarcastic comment was referred to this post...

The Supra still handles alot better than an old musclecar with an axle and leaf springs in the back.

I dont think the Viper has leaf springs... 😛

But the blanket statement (I know...made in sarcasm 😛) of saying "fast in US = straight" is a glaring innacuracy, just as long as you know that 😉

Yeah i know... but to the general public here... more HP sells... i doubt many of them even know the Viper and Corvette dominated their class...let alone know what the hell LeMans is... or that they even beat F550s. 😀
 
Originally posted by: geno
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: boyRacer

Hey cmon... you know its only about going fast in a straight line in this country... 😛

LOL, or go fast, turn left.....


:beer:

Yeah, cause the Viper was never a huge competitor in LeMans or anything...
And the Corvette C5R was never dominant either...
rolleye.gif

We aren't talking about Vpiers and Corvettes in this thread. We are talking about musclecars and Japanese I6es.
 
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...


 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...

Sorry to resurrect this thread, but once again I have to say, fuel mixture has nothing to do with compression ratio 😉 Compression ratio is mesured by *one thing*, the amount of volume being displaced by a piston when it's down as a ratio to the volume it is compressed to, and that's it. This never changes in any engine, ever, except for some very very rare motors that have pivoting heads to vary the compression, but it's a very expensive and inconvenient idea. So for all intents and purposes, compression ratios will always be the same in any motor we have around today.
 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...


I think you have air-fuel ratio confused with compression ratio.
 
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...


I think you have air-fuel ratio confused with compression ratio.

No.. Air-fuel ratio stays the same. He means it's virtually higher compression ratio, since it's the same as having a bigger cylinder, and that air is compressed into the same space.
 
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...
WTF?
 
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...


I think you have air-fuel ratio confused with compression ratio.

No.. Air-fuel ratio stays the same. He means it's virtually higher compression ratio, since it's the same as having a bigger cylinder, and that air is compressed into the same space.
No, how do you define compression ratio?
 
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...


I think you have air-fuel ratio confused with compression ratio.

No.. Air-fuel ratio stays the same. He means it's virtually higher compression ratio, since it's the same as having a bigger cylinder, and that air is compressed into the same space.
No, how do you define compression ratio?

Which kind? Some people are talking about static, some are talking about dynamic.
 
Originally posted by: atom
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosis
Originally posted by: OS
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: geno
They run those things at extremly high pressure (20-25 psi) so the compression ration is scarily big.
Compression ratios will stay the same no matter what psi you run 😛 It's the cylindar pressures that increase. BTW: You can hype up an RB26 all you want, no straight 6 will beat the max horsepower of a fat ol' crate V8 like a 500ci Hemi

not necessarily, people who run that much psi generally lean the engines out (less fuel..bigger compression ratio) to squeeze more hp.

But yeah 426 hemi with a blower and nitrous will definitelly max out at twice the hp of rb26 with anything you can slap on it...


I think you have air-fuel ratio confused with compression ratio.

No.. Air-fuel ratio stays the same. He means it's virtually higher compression ratio, since it's the same as having a bigger cylinder, and that air is compressed into the same space.
No, how do you define compression ratio?

Which kind? Some people are talking about static, some are talking about dynamic.

I don't know what that means. If you define compression ratio as the amount that the air is compressed, then it probably is higher with a turbo, because much more air is being compressed into a slightly bigger space.
 
Originally posted by: WinkOsmosisI don't know what that means. If you define compression ratio as the amount that the air is compressed, then it probably is higher with a turbo, because much more air is being compressed into a slightly bigger space.


IIRC, static compression is defined by cylinder volume. Forced induction doesn't change the volume, but the cylinder pressure.
 
I don't know what that means. If you define compression ratio as the amount that the air is compressed, then it probably is higher with a turbo, because much more air is being compressed into a slightly bigger space.

Compression ratio has nothing to do with the amount of air compressed, it's sheerly based on volume. It has nothing to do with mass.
 
Back
Top