-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
What would happen if...
- Thread starter dxkj
- Start date
Goosemaster
Lifer
What do you know...your post just game me a frontal lobotomy😕
sharkeeper
Lifer
IF a terrorist COULD blast off in a rocket, they would go up into LEO and bring it back down to WDC then detonate. It should be obvious how they work by now!
Cheers!
Cheers!
According to this article from Encarta, it says that the Earth was mostly likely moon-less in the begining.
ORIGIN OF THE MOON
Measuring the ages of lunar rocks has revealed that the Moon is about 4.6 billion years old, or about the same age as Earth and probably the rest of the solar system. Before the modern age of space exploration, scientists had three major models for the origin of the Moon. The fission from Earth model proposed that the young, molten Earth rotated so fast that it flung off some material that became the Moon. The formation in Earth orbit model claimed that the Moon formed independently, but close enough to Earth to orbit the planet. The formation far from Earth model proposed that the Moon formed independently in orbit around the Sun but was subsequently captured by Earth?s gravity when it passed close to the planet. None of these three models, however, is entirely consistent with current knowledge of the Moon. In 1975, having studied moon rocks and close-up pictures of the Moon, scientists proposed what has come to be regarded as the most probable of the theories of formation: a giant, planetary impact.
The giant impact model proposes that early in Earth?s history, well over 4 billion years ago, Earth was struck by a large planet-sized body. Early estimates for the size of this object were comparable to the size of Mars, but a computer simulation by American scientists in 1997 suggested that the body would have to have been at least 2.5 to 3 times the size of Mars. The catastrophic impact blasted portions of Earth and the impacting body into Earth orbit, where debris from the impact eventually coalesced to form the Moon. After years of research on lunar rocks during the 1970s and 1980s, this model became the most widely accepted one for the Moon?s origin. The giant impact model seems to account for all of the available evidence: the similarity in composition between Earth and Moon indicated by analysis of lunar samples, the near-complete global melting of the Moon (and possibly Earth) in the distant past , and the simple fact that the other models are all inadequate to one degree or another. Research continues on the ramifications of such a violent lunar origin to the early history of Earth and the other planets.
© 1993-2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
ORIGIN OF THE MOON
Measuring the ages of lunar rocks has revealed that the Moon is about 4.6 billion years old, or about the same age as Earth and probably the rest of the solar system. Before the modern age of space exploration, scientists had three major models for the origin of the Moon. The fission from Earth model proposed that the young, molten Earth rotated so fast that it flung off some material that became the Moon. The formation in Earth orbit model claimed that the Moon formed independently, but close enough to Earth to orbit the planet. The formation far from Earth model proposed that the Moon formed independently in orbit around the Sun but was subsequently captured by Earth?s gravity when it passed close to the planet. None of these three models, however, is entirely consistent with current knowledge of the Moon. In 1975, having studied moon rocks and close-up pictures of the Moon, scientists proposed what has come to be regarded as the most probable of the theories of formation: a giant, planetary impact.
The giant impact model proposes that early in Earth?s history, well over 4 billion years ago, Earth was struck by a large planet-sized body. Early estimates for the size of this object were comparable to the size of Mars, but a computer simulation by American scientists in 1997 suggested that the body would have to have been at least 2.5 to 3 times the size of Mars. The catastrophic impact blasted portions of Earth and the impacting body into Earth orbit, where debris from the impact eventually coalesced to form the Moon. After years of research on lunar rocks during the 1970s and 1980s, this model became the most widely accepted one for the Moon?s origin. The giant impact model seems to account for all of the available evidence: the similarity in composition between Earth and Moon indicated by analysis of lunar samples, the near-complete global melting of the Moon (and possibly Earth) in the distant past , and the simple fact that the other models are all inadequate to one degree or another. Research continues on the ramifications of such a violent lunar origin to the early history of Earth and the other planets.
© 1993-2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
