There would be more new and original ideas, less medical bankruptcies, and less bureaucracy. The system here in the u.s. has more ideas than more fully socialist countries, but Americans are less pro-order so they can handle more ingenuity. Italy created 9% of the world's new drugs during the 20 year period that had limited patents; that is because Northern Italians have higher fluid intelligence than 80-95% of europe. The U.S. recycles so much waste because of the patent system; the fluid reasoning of all Americans being quite a bit higher than all those in the EU is going to waste due to extreme centralization! It is a shame that so many aren't even taking advantage of cutting red tape and getting cheap legal advice like off the internet under a non-personally Authoritarian president.
[Digression: Newt (and maybe Elizabeth Warren) is the only possible candidate for President who would change the world after Obama leaves office. I've gotten so much free, good stuff off the internet while Obama has been president that I never could've under Bush's Admin. A problem is my parents lack of desire to invest in real things that they could make more cash off of and my compulsiveness/laziness preventing me from seeking a job in a firm not funded by the State or the U.S.G.]
But back to topic...
Physicians often believe their way is the only way and licensure is partly way.
Licensure might keep the offices organized (those who go through so much schooling are more likely to be hyper-organized) but it doesn't do any good (my dad's old practice is so huge few know where to go; Riverside in Newport News is coercive and bureaucratic while they often don't even have the latest and best). It has come at the expense of medical fascism so a lot of people don't appreciate the differences between a mom and pop shop with original equipment vs an industrial grade hospital with old equipment or reform/latest year model equipment. The practice my dad founded got huge and as such overhead reached 4/5 for a fiscal year (IIRC) and was never lower than 1/2 each of the 5 last years he worked.
Cash in the banks claimed by my parents is currently not less than $1.2mn (yet taxable income was above $200k from 94-96) and we could be SOL once interest rates go up (he refuses to invest in anything real or even consult with those who were successful). Not all physicians are like that, but perhaps medical fascism makes for lazier less competent physicians. And my dad was so worried about money yet he could never invest on his own and he never took the right opportunities. And he just wouldn't cut through any red tape due to uncertainty and the INFJ desire to following the law. His hands feel good though, he had an excellent working memory, and he has done a lot of volunteering.
Anyway, I imagine license requirements will go down given more female physicians in the future and the feminine ability to handle disorder.
Additionally, suicide should be an option as some patients don't want to be reformed. The nurses are often as smart as the doctors these days so the nurses don't mind letting go.
So what would you do about licensure?
[Digression: Newt (and maybe Elizabeth Warren) is the only possible candidate for President who would change the world after Obama leaves office. I've gotten so much free, good stuff off the internet while Obama has been president that I never could've under Bush's Admin. A problem is my parents lack of desire to invest in real things that they could make more cash off of and my compulsiveness/laziness preventing me from seeking a job in a firm not funded by the State or the U.S.G.]
But back to topic...
Physicians often believe their way is the only way and licensure is partly way.
Licensure might keep the offices organized (those who go through so much schooling are more likely to be hyper-organized) but it doesn't do any good (my dad's old practice is so huge few know where to go; Riverside in Newport News is coercive and bureaucratic while they often don't even have the latest and best). It has come at the expense of medical fascism so a lot of people don't appreciate the differences between a mom and pop shop with original equipment vs an industrial grade hospital with old equipment or reform/latest year model equipment. The practice my dad founded got huge and as such overhead reached 4/5 for a fiscal year (IIRC) and was never lower than 1/2 each of the 5 last years he worked.
Cash in the banks claimed by my parents is currently not less than $1.2mn (yet taxable income was above $200k from 94-96) and we could be SOL once interest rates go up (he refuses to invest in anything real or even consult with those who were successful). Not all physicians are like that, but perhaps medical fascism makes for lazier less competent physicians. And my dad was so worried about money yet he could never invest on his own and he never took the right opportunities. And he just wouldn't cut through any red tape due to uncertainty and the INFJ desire to following the law. His hands feel good though, he had an excellent working memory, and he has done a lot of volunteering.
Anyway, I imagine license requirements will go down given more female physicians in the future and the feminine ability to handle disorder.
Additionally, suicide should be an option as some patients don't want to be reformed. The nurses are often as smart as the doctors these days so the nurses don't mind letting go.
So what would you do about licensure?
Facebook
Twitter