^ As I said, back up what you supposedly "predicted" and get back to us. Bernanke himself has admitted that borrowing at the current rate the federal gov't is borrowing at is not sustainable long-term and that is well known by all economists and has been repeated ad nauseum by GAO officials for years now (gov't programs such as Social Security and Medicare being one of the many burdens that makes it difficult to borrow for extended periods of time without significant tax increases). The fact that you can't even acknowledge the low and stable nature of inflation over the last 20+ years (yes, without gold-backed money!) is yet another of many clues into just how little you understand about this economy or any world economy. How you also completely fail to acknowledge that equity investment in the U.S. has been stable for over 200+ years steadily returning 7% annually on the mean, better than bonds or bills, a trend that has been empirically verified in dozens of other countries. This does not compute in your fantasy, Paulbot conspiracy theory world of yours. It's probably because you never got the proper education, and while I really hate to keep harping on that, because as you said it's insulting, in your case it's absolutely true. You have no background to speak of, yet talk as if you have the slightest clue what this economy is capable of all while continuing to fail to explain what you would do to help mitigate aggregate economic swoons, which are no worse now (in fact, they're much better) than they were when money was backed by gold.