Actually, I'd forgotten about that one. That was believed to have been from Sikhs.Originally posted by: bdude
Air India Flight 182 - 329 deaths
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisda...id_2516000/2516407.stmOriginally posted by: Train
never heard of an Isreali, or an american for that matter, blowing themselves up in Beirut. But if you say it was "US/Isreal" supported, than it must be true!
In Context
From 1975 until the early 1990s Lebanon suffered a bloody civil war in which regional powers - particularly Israel, Syria and the Palestine Liberation Organisation - used the country as a battlefield for their own conflicts.
Israeli troops invaded in 1982 before pulling back to a self-declared "security zone" in southern Lebanon in 1985.
The final death toll in the car bomb explosion was more than 80.
Some American press reports said the CIA was behind the attack, which was meant to kill Sheikh Fadlallah. He had been accused of supporting the suicide bombers who killed hundreds of US and French troops in attacks on military headquarters in Beirut in 1983 - a charge he has always denied.
The kidnapping of American journalist Terry Anderson eight days after the bomb has also been linked to the attempt on the sheikh's life.
President Reagan and the CIA called off covert operations when Lebanese intelligence operatives -- some allegedly trained by the U.S. -- set off a car bomb on March 8, 1985, in an attempted murder of Sheik Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah, the Shiite Muslim cleric who some believed to be the spiritual leader of Hezbollah. Over 80 people were killed in the attack near a Beirut mosque. Fadlallah survived.
Many blamed the CIA for the attack, saying it had directed the intelligence operatives to carry it out. Robert McFarlane, President Reagan's national security adviser, says that the operatives who carried out the attack on Fadlallah may have been trained by the U.S., but the individuals who carried it out were "rogue operative," and the CIA in no way sanctioned or supported the attack.
Way to read more into this thread than exists.Originally posted by: AntaresVI
So an attack was carried out by us-trained forces and some news agencies reported that it was US-backed, and all the sudden it's a US attack? This OP is nothing but flamebait.
Originally posted by: conjur
Way to read more into this thread than exists.Originally posted by: AntaresVI
So an attack was carried out by us-trained forces and some news agencies reported that it was US-backed, and all the sudden it's a US attack? This OP is nothing but flamebait.
Originally posted by: bdude
Air India Flight 182 - 329 deaths
Not idiots. Just ignorant of the truth. There's a huge difference.Originally posted by: AntaresVI
Well, you certainly could have chosen a more corroborated example, and I still think that making it a quiz for which you would provide the right answer was a poor way to get your point across. I see what your point is, i just think you could have made it without implying that most of ATPN's crew is (are?) idiots.
