• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

What video card for the computer artist - not the computer gamer?

JJHendrix

Senior member
Recomendations?

I have an Annihilator Pro lying around which i could use for the machine, but i'm wondering if it is worth it to fork out the dough for a brand new card.

Is there a noticeable difference in Photoshop with a video card that has 64 megs and a video card with 32 megs?

The computer will be used 99.9% exclusively for Photoshop and other graphics programs.
 
I don't know about windows, but w/ Xfree86 4 (or maybe even the 3.x versions), X automagically maps pixmaps into onboard video memory for caching. When i switched from my old 16MB TNT to my new 64MB gf2, there was a very very noticeable difference in 2d performance. especially when working w/ large pixmaps. Sorry this doesn't directly answer your question, but windows/photoshop might do something similar.

Joseph Duerr
 
Most definatly with out a doubt the G450.
Matrox has the best 2D Quality I have ever seen, much better than the Geforce, V5, or the Radeon.
 
I'm going to have to add another vote for Matrox. They make one of, if not the best 2D cards out there. I'm using an 8 meg G200 and I love the colors on it. It's time for me to upgrade but I'm afraid to loose the great 2D from this card. But I need a card that can run games as well so there's that rock and a hard place again! 🙂
 
Back
Top