What video card for 50+ fps at 1920x1200?

asintu

Senior member
Apr 8, 2005
628
0
0
What video card would allow me to play games at 1920 resolution and get over 50fps for new games coming throughout the next 12months? Assume quality settings are set to high.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: asintu
What video card would allow me to play games at 1920 resolution and get over 50fps for new games coming throughout the next 12months? Assume quality settings are set to high.
All games?

Nothing you can buy yet, a $550 nv 9800GX2 is only 40 fps in Crysis - slow!

It should be good enough if you're willing to lower quality settings a bit sometimes.
 

asintu

Senior member
Apr 8, 2005
628
0
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: asintu
What video card would allow me to play games at 1920 resolution and get over 50fps for new games coming throughout the next 12months? Assume quality settings are set to high.
All games?

no, i meant 50+ on average for the new games
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
An 8800GTS 512 for $200 (newegg, MSI, after $30 rebate) will do that for most current games, for new game you might have to turn down settings. It's also cheap enough that you could buy it now and replace it in 6-9 months.

It's a much better value than the $300 9800GTX, especially if you are willing to upgrade again sooner than in a year.
 

warriorfan23

Senior member
Nov 11, 2001
355
0
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
An 8800GTS 512 for $200 (newegg, MSI, after $30 rebate) will do that for most current games, for new game you might have to turn down settings. It's also cheap enough that you could buy it now and replace it in 6-9 months.

It's a much better value than the $300 9800GTX, especially if you are willing to upgrade again sooner than in a year.

this is what im gonna do!
 

asintu

Senior member
Apr 8, 2005
628
0
0
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
An 8800GTS 512 for $200 (newegg, MSI, after $30 rebate) will do that for most current games, for new game you might have to turn down settings. It's also cheap enough that you could buy it now and replace it in 6-9 months.

It's a much better value than the $300 9800GTX, especially if you are willing to upgrade again sooner than in a year.

isn't the gts pretty equal with a gt in most games? why not get a gt?
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
Originally posted by: asintu
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
An 8800GTS 512 for $200 (newegg, MSI, after $30 rebate) will do that for most current games, for new game you might have to turn down settings. It's also cheap enough that you could buy it now and replace it in 6-9 months.

It's a much better value than the $300 9800GTX, especially if you are willing to upgrade again sooner than in a year.

isn't the gts pretty equal with a gt in most games? why not get a gt?

GTS is faster. Higher clocks, better cooler, 16 more shaders.
 

asintu

Senior member
Apr 8, 2005
628
0
0
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: asintu
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
An 8800GTS 512 for $200 (newegg, MSI, after $30 rebate) will do that for most current games, for new game you might have to turn down settings. It's also cheap enough that you could buy it now and replace it in 6-9 months.

It's a much better value than the $300 9800GTX, especially if you are willing to upgrade again sooner than in a year.

isn't the gts pretty equal with a gt in most games? why not get a gt?

GTS is faster. Higher clocks, better cooler, 16 more shaders.

are we talking about the new 8800gts or the first one?
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
Originally posted by: asintu
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: asintu
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
An 8800GTS 512 for $200 (newegg, MSI, after $30 rebate) will do that for most current games, for new game you might have to turn down settings. It's also cheap enough that you could buy it now and replace it in 6-9 months.

It's a much better value than the $300 9800GTX, especially if you are willing to upgrade again sooner than in a year.

isn't the gts pretty equal with a gt in most games? why not get a gt?

GTS is faster. Higher clocks, better cooler, 16 more shaders.

are we talking about the new 8800gts or the first one?

The one you were talking about, of course. You know, the one you quoted DaveSimmons on?
 

Jax Omen

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2008
1,654
2
81
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
An 8800GTS 512 for $200 (newegg, MSI, after $30 rebate) will do that for most current games, for new game you might have to turn down settings. It's also cheap enough that you could buy it now and replace it in 6-9 months.

It's a much better value than the $300 9800GTX, especially if you are willing to upgrade again sooner than in a year.

That's what I'm doing. My 320MB GTS isn't gonna cut it at 1920x1200 on my new monitor, but it'll work great on my girlfriend's 1440x900 monitor.
 

thilanliyan

Lifer
Jun 21, 2005
11,864
2,066
126
Other than Crysis, you should be okay with a 8800GTS or even a OCed 8800GT. All the games I've run recently have been fairly decent at 1920x1200 with my OCed GT.
 

Jax Omen

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2008
1,654
2
81
Several of my games have been somewhat struggling at 1600x1200 without AA already. I used the monitor purchase to get the upgrade. It's the video RAM that's doing it, I think, more than the processing power.