I have to somewhat disagree with the shortylickens contention that, "Seriously. We have been telling you that laser print quality is far superior to inkjet, and if you dont get a piece of junk it will last longer than an inkjet printer anyway. And despite some pretty ridiculous arguments from the ink fanboys, we've proven that its far cheaper as well."
And if we are just talking monochrome, I will agree the laser is far faster, and has slightly superior resolution. And if you look at the printermarket today, for off the shelf models, and using OEM consumables, the below average laser will come in at half the per page consumable cost of the best ink jet.
However, this not the way it has to be. If the printer manufacturers designed ink jets to properly exploit ink, we would find Laser hard pressed to compete on monochrome consumable costs, and ink jets would blow lasers away on color consumable costs. And instead, ink jet printer manufacturers design ink jets to ripoff poorly informed consumers. And its worked out to be great for ink jet printer manufacturers that can sell poorly engineered and short life printers below cost, and make boat loads of money doing it. As soon as consumers buy OEM replacement cartridges, the money rolls in, vending ink the takes less than $50.00/gallon to make for a low of $2300 to well over $10,000/gallon in extreme cases when put into cartridge form.