- Jul 10, 2007
- 12,041
- 3
- 0
organic is mostly older cars and is not used on most so I will leave it at don;t use.
Ceramic is great for low noise and dust. The bad is they are not great with heat so high speed driving and towing is a place you should not use ceramic.
Semi-Met is great for performance and can usually handle heat and weight. They are more likly to make a little noise and also produce more dust.
My CTS and Corvette has ceramic in the front and semi-met in the rear. My truck has Semi-met as I tow a lot with it.
Rockauto.com has a lot of good pads and the Gold pads from AZ and Advance are also good.
What is the year, make, and model? Also what is it mostly used for?
I think you have your heat problem with ceramic pads backwards? They are awesome at dealing with high heat, they have problems with low heat. If they do not have any heat in them (when you first start driving) they have problems creating enough friction.
Yeah, I was going to post this. Ceramic Breaks are usually an additional option (more $$) for cars like Porsche, Ferrari, etc. They can disperse heat much quicker reducing break fade. I think they can sometimes squeak when first cold.
Wow...
Two separate people so far (including the one who linked to wikipedia) have managed to confuse brake pads with brake rotors. Carbon ceramic rotors need to heat up first. Ceramic pads are fine in low-heat street applications. Ceramic pads have very different compositions than carbon ceramic rotors.
Ceramic pads handle high-heat better than most, but their main advantages are longer life, quieter operation, and less dust build-up. Ceramic pads generally don't have as much overall "bite" as race-compound metallic pads, but ceramic pads also don't eat rotors the same way that race-compound metallic pads do and they don't have the same issues with degraded wet performance that performance metallic pads sometimes do.
Semi-metallic pads have wide varieties of compositions and can range anywhere from race-compound pads that need heat to bite but will chew through a set of rotors in no time if you let them get up to temp to mild street formulations that are only barely superior to organic pads. Metallic and semi-metallic pads are the most prone to noise, but they last longer than organic pads (at the cost of wearing the rotors more than other types).
Organic pads are usually cheapest and they work well as long as they aren't over-heated. However, they also create the greatest amount of dust and they wear out the fastest.
For street cars that won't ever see a track, I pretty much universally recommend ceramic pads. They have, IMO, the best overall balance for everyday use and even when towing they are fine. Ceramic pads sometimes have less initial "bite" (that is, a light pressure doesn't grab as fast as with semi-metallics), but overall braking force is not diminished, the buildup is just more gradual and more linear with pedal pressure.
For a car that sees both street and track duty, I'd go with with a "performance" oriented semi-metallic pad and accept the trade-off in noise and rotor wear.
The only reason I'd use organic pads these days was if I literally couldn't afford the other options but needed new pads anyway.
ZV
I find that very difficult to believe.This has been a complaint on numerous car forms I have visited (generally they are "performance oriented" ceramic pads) and I've read two or three threads complaining of near wrecks when the car brakes excessively despite the light press on the brake pedal.
My understanding is that ceramic pads have issues with cold performance. There initial grip is lessened and then they hit a "bite" point where they feel like you hit the brakes harder than you meant to. This has been a complaint on numerous car forms I have visited (generally they are "performance oriented" ceramic pads) and I've read two or three threads complaining of near wrecks when the car brakes excessively despite the light press on the brake pedal.
I understand I didn't explain well enough in my previous post, but you knew what I meant![]()
I use ceramic pads on all of my non-track vehicles and I've never experienced this supposed issue. I strongly doubt the veracity of those claims and am quite certain that the people making those complaints are covering for their own ineptitude.
ZV
I agree with this and went with this route when I needed pads for my 97 Subaru wagon that my fiancée would be driving. I wanted something with low noise, low dust and the car would be driven lightly so I wasn't concerned about high speed stops or repeated stops.For street cars that won't ever see a track, I pretty much universally recommend ceramic pads. They have, IMO, the best overall balance for everyday use and even when towing they are fine. Ceramic pads sometimes have less initial "bite" (that is, a light pressure doesn't grab as fast as with semi-metallics), but overall braking force is not diminished, the buildup is just more gradual and more linear with pedal pressure.
Bosch and many other makers do NOT recommended Ceramic pads for high speed driving (autocross type driving) or towing. Street ceramic pads do fine in cooler temps but when they get very hot they will fade and not grip as well. Again most drivers will not notice this. But for trucks that tow a fair amount of weight or those with cars they like to track and will brake a lot then use a semi-met.
The initial bite is a little soft. But whether cold or warmed up, they stop the car well.
Fair enough, but most people don't do the sort of "severe duty" towing that most pad manufacturers caution against with ceramic pads. Towing 5,000+ pounds through the mountains? Yeah, best to avoid ceramic pads. Towing your jet-ski to the lake? Ceramics will be fine.
ZV
I agree, that is why I posted my cars and pads. I have ceramic even on my Corvette. But my truck that I have 1000+ pds in it all the time I went with Semi-met. There was even someone here with a fullsize truck that had brake issues when he was hauling/towing and had ceramic pads.
The biggest reason I pointed that out was the OP did not say what he drove. If he said XYZ car that is used to haul myself and the kids I would say ceramic. But if he said truck I would play it safe and go with a good semi-met pad. Even if he does not tow/haul much he could let someone borrow it and many people overload trucks all the time.
For me its one of those CYA things.
organic is mostly older cars and is not used on most so I will leave it at don;t use.
Ceramic is great for low noise and dust. The bad is they are not great with heat so high speed driving and towing is a place you should not use ceramic.
Semi-Met is great for performance and can usually handle heat and weight. They are more likly to make a little noise and also produce more dust.
My CTS and Corvette has ceramic in the front and semi-met in the rear. My truck has Semi-met as I tow a lot with it.
Rockauto.com has a lot of good pads and the Gold pads from AZ and Advance are also good.
What is the year, make, and model? Also what is it mostly used for?