crashtech
Lifer
My thought is, why? ST performance of the A8 is not going to be anything to brag about, and the budget seems to indicate that a dGPU is not a problem. So, why A8?I was thinking the A8-7600 APU would be perfect here... thoughts?
My thought is, why? ST performance of the A8 is not going to be anything to brag about, and the budget seems to indicate that a dGPU is not a problem. So, why A8?I was thinking the A8-7600 APU would be perfect here... thoughts?
Lol, if that's so, grab a g3258, I'm running 2 threads worth of haswell @4.6 @$70 cpu xDI don't understand the reason for recommending a slow i5 for Minecraft. AFAIK, it is single-threaded, and would therefore run best on a late-model CPU with high clock speed, regardless of core count. I'd just as soon run a i3-4170 at 3.7GHz.
No reason for a K series if no overclocking in that case. It would be silly to buy a 4790 (k or otherwise) for minecraft IMO.
Lol, if that's so, grab a g3258, I'm running 2 threads worth of haswell @4.6 @$70 cpu xD
i think you just need to assign more ram to minecraft/java. same specs as me (mine is a 770) and my fps count is ridiculous (i around 130)Thing is, I'm not trolling. I have a 4.3Ghz 4670k, 1.1Ghz 280x, 8GB RAM, and I am running off an SSD but could still drop below 40fps. I'll upload proof if you wish.
If OP has $1k and wants to play modded (that is why I asked) I think the 4690k, GTX 960, and 8GB RAM is a great place to start.
i think you just need to assign more ram to minecraft/java. same specs as me (mine is a 770) and my fps count is ridiculous (i around 130)
also: optifine
yeah but OP who cant even write Minecraft properly will probably not be running that many mods.
and putting 17 mods on an already poorly optimized game like MC is suicidal.
honestly, im curious as to what those 17 mods could possibly be. bukkit / ic2?