Originally posted by: tcsenter
you're not familar with the X1950 AGP series are you?
Apparently more familiar than you are with logic, reason, and facts.
As plenty of people have found out, including more than few members of this forum, the X1950 AGP series cards have a very high failure rate with PSU's that can't deliver 30A or better on the +12v rail...they seem to draw considerably more power than their PCI-E counterparts.
Oh right, I forgot about those "special" AGP versions of the X1950 PRO made from "special" transistors that require more power than PCI Express transistors. They use the exact same GPU. The only possible difference between the two is the additional power required by the Rialto bridge chip.
It doesn't matter if its AGP or PCI Express, ALL X1800/1900 Series cards carry the same 30A single and 38A dual power recommendation, including the X1950XTX. Again, if one card requires 30A, how does two require only 8A more?
Even the X1950XTX with higher clocks, 50M more transistors, 12 more shaders, 20GB/s greater memory bandwidth, and much higher performance places not more than
10A (120W) load on +12V power.
Are you suggesting that these "special" AGP transistors make the much less powerful X1950 PRO use more power than the X1950XTX? lmao!
Here are two reviews of the X1950PRO AGP that used PSUs with 18A MAX on a single +12V rail, one of which was a lowly 300W model, neither had any problem supporting the load of this card:
CleverPower SPS300 PSU @ Lost Circuits (300W total power with
18A MAX +12V)
Tagan TG420-U01 PSU @ Driver Heavan (420W total power with
18A MAX +12V)
From the Lost Circuits review:
"Needless to say that AGP or PCIe - it really doesn't matter for power consumption - except for the way it is supplied."
Questions?